“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label coercive safeguarding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coercive safeguarding. Show all posts

Why My Children Never Want to Speak to a Social Worker Again

 πŸ“¬ SWANK Dispatch: He Said He’d Restore Our Faith in Social Work. Instead, He Traumatised My Children in Public.

πŸ—“️ 5 January 2024

Filed Under: public interrogation, child distress, coercive safeguarding, RBKC misconduct, sewer gas ignored, asthma requests dismissed, assessment failure, social worker surveillance, adultism, mother-blame culture


“He said he’d restore our faith.
Instead, he interrogated my sons on a playground.
In front of their new friends.
Without me there.
Now they call it abuse.”

— A Mother Who’s Had Enough of Empty Promises and Repeated Harm


This formal letter from Polly Chromatic to Rebecca Webber of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea documents a disturbing interaction on 5 July 2023, when social workers Eric Wedge-Bull and Jess visited her family’s new home at 37 Elgin Crescent.

What was promised as a rebuilding of trust became yet another violation of boundaries, dignity, and psychological safety.


πŸ‘¦πŸ½ I. Public Interrogation as “Assessment”

  • Eric asked Polly to leave her sons, Kingdom and Prerogative, with him at the community garden playground

  • He questioned them without consent, in front of peers and adults

  • The children returned visibly shaken

  • They later described Eric’s approach as aggressive and humiliating

  • The community later reprimanded Polly for bringing outside professionals into the shared space — a detail that adds to the emotional fallout and isolation


🫁 II. Ignored Requests, Unfinished Assessments

Despite Polly asking Jess for:

  • Help with medical counselling for eosinophilic asthma

  • Legal support to change their names

No follow-up was ever sent.
No formal report was issued until months later, and only after Noelle emailed chasing it in response to a hospital-instigated safeguarding referral.

The report had clearly never been finished.
Eric apologised — but the damage was done.
Repeated patterns of ghosting, abandonment, and surveillance had returned yet again.


🧠 III. What This Mother Knows

  • She’s been working with children since age 10

  • Formerly a teacher, daycare worker, nanny

  • Still in contact with the mothers of all the families she’s cared for

  • Repeatedly praised by neighbours and community members for her parenting

  • Not a single community member has raised concerns — only distant professionals operating on projections


✋ IV. The Demand

“My children do not want to be questioned again.
We are not supported by social workers.
We experience them as abusive.”

Polly states clearly: leave us alone.
Her children were abused by social workers in Turks and Caicos, and their most recent encounter in London has left them retraumatised.


SWANK Summary:

He came to repair trust.
He broke it further.

They asked for asthma support.
They got silence.

They offered openness.
They received surveillance.

Now they’re closing the door — and writing it down.



A Formal Statement from the Family of Chromatic

πŸ‘‘ SWANK PRESS DISPATCH
Institutional Retaliation Is Not Care—It’s Criminal

πŸ“† 29 May 2025
🏷️ Labels: Press ReleaseCriminal ReferralNHS HarassmentPolice MisconductSocial Worker AbuseDisability DiscriminationLegal ComplaintCivil ClaimJudicial ReviewCoercive SafeguardingPLO RetaliationEnergetic WarfareField AbuseSystemic Retaliation


“Institutional Retaliation Is Not Care—It’s Criminal”

A Formal Statement from the Family of Chromatic

πŸͺž Filed Under: Legal Escalation, Disability Rights, Criminal Misconduct, Retaliation by Safeguarding, NHS Harassment, Police Negligence


πŸ’Ό Formal Complaint Alleges Coordinated Criminal Misconduct

A British Resident mother and her four disabled children have filed a formal, multi-agency complaint exposing a coordinated pattern of institutional misconduct that defies any reasonable claim of “care.”

Ms Chromatic—diagnosed with muscle tension dysphoniaeosinophilic asthma, and PTSD—reports a sustained campaign of:

  • ❌ False safeguarding referrals triggered immediately after hospital discrimination

  • ❌ Unlawful child interviews without notice, support, or legal authority

  • ❌ Forced verbal communication despite medical orders for written-only contact

  • ❌ Escalated PLO retaliation masquerading as concern

  • ❌ Police refusal to retrieve CCTV evidence which would have cleared the family entirely

πŸ’¬ “This isn’t child protection,” she writes. “It’s punishment by process.”


πŸ“œ Legal Foundations & Claims

The formal complaint, entitled:
“Section VII: Legal Breaches and Grounds for Criminal Investigation”
details breaches of:

  • The Equality Act 2010

  • The Human Rights Act 1998

  • The Fraud Act 2006

  • The Children Act 1989

  • The Protection from Harassment Act 1997

🧾 Active proceedings include:

  • An N1 Civil Claim

  • An N461 Judicial Review Application
    —together totalling over £23 million in damages sought.


πŸ›‘ No Verbal Contact — Written Only

In accordance with her medical access needsMs Chromatic cannot communicate by phone.

πŸ“œ View her Written Communication Statement:
swankarchive.com/p/written-communication-statement.html

πŸ“© Email for press or document access:
complaints@swankarchive.com

🌐 Full Legal Bundle and Public Archive:
www.swankarchive.com


This is not a misunderstanding.
It’s a structural malfunction.
And SWANK is watching.


Polly Chromatic
Curator-in-Chief, SWANK Archive
Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms

Documented Obsessions