🦚 A Formal Complaint Against Mr. Earl Bullhead: Dereliction of Duty, Discriminatory Inaction, and Professional Apathy
Filed under the solemn documentation of safeguarding negligence and administrative indifference.
2025.04.04
To: RBKC Complaints Department
Subject: Formal Complaint: Earl Bullhead – Dereliction of Duty, Discriminatory Inaction & Professional Apathy
🧾 Dear Complaints Team,
I write to submit a formal complaint regarding Mr. Earl Bullhead, whose conduct — or more precisely, his conspicuous failure to conduct himself at all — raises serious and documented concerns about the operational culture within your safeguarding and social work services.
Despite being directly copied into multiple formal communications outlining breaches of duty, medical emergencies, and discriminatory practice, Mr. Bullhead elected to remain entirely inert — offering neither acknowledgment, action, nor even the basic courtesy of professional engagement.
In his silence, harm was not merely permitted — it was institutionalised.
📜 Summary of Concerns
Mr. Bullhead was repeatedly and explicitly made aware of grave matters, including:
The systematic denial of reasonable adjustments for my documented communication-related disabilities (eosinophilic asthma and muscle tension dysphonia);
The emotional and physical harm caused by Mr. Ernie Wallace and others under or adjacent to Mr. Bullhead’s professional purview;
The repeated introduction of respiratory infections into my household during recovery from sewer gas exposure, facilitated through unprotected and medically reckless social work visits;
The ongoing forced engagement during periods of acute illness, constituting a grotesque inversion of safeguarding principles.
To each of these serious disclosures, Mr. Bullhead responded with silence so complete it bordered on institutional contempt.
📚 Specific Failures
Failure | Description |
---|---|
Safeguarding Ignored | No internal escalation, intervention, or visible concern following urgent disclosures. |
Colleague Misconduct Unchallenged | No apparent investigation into the serious misconduct of those operating within his vicinity. |
Collusion Through Inertia | By doing nothing, Mr. Bullhead effectively sanctioned ongoing harm under the pretext of administrative detachment. |
🩻 Outcomes Requested
Accordingly, I respectfully request that RBKC:
Initiate a formal investigation into Mr. Bullhead’s professional conduct, particularly his disregard for safeguarding obligations, disability discrimination, and preventable harm;
Provide a written explanation clarifying why no responsive steps were taken, despite traceable and formal communications;
Clarify what structural mechanisms exist to prevent senior staff from insulating themselves against accountability through silence.
🪧 Closing Remarks
The role of a safeguarding professional is not to spectate while harm unfolds.
Silence, in this context, is not neutrality. It is permission.
Mr. Bullhead’s silence constituted not merely inaction, but a tacit endorsement of continued suffering — a betrayal of the very principles he was entrusted to uphold.
To have one’s rights, health, and voice so thoroughly disregarded by a senior officer within your department is not merely disappointing.
It is, quite plainly, unconscionable.
I trust that this matter will now be treated with the seriousness and structural reflection it demands.
Yours,
With Respectful Reciprocity and Constitutional Precision,
Polly