“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Death Risk Ignored. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Death Risk Ignored. Show all posts

The Risk Was Death. She Replied With a Hyperlink Problem.


⟡ “I Told Her She Might Kill Me. She Replied About a Broken Link.” ⟡
A parent warns that continued institutional harassment may cause death. Westminster’s safeguarding officer replies with procedural neutralism, complete disregard for medical risk, and a question about court. This isn’t oversight. It’s administrative manslaughter in preview mode.

Filed: 15 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/MED-03
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-15_SWANK_Email_Westminster_KirstyHornal_DisabilityCrisisDismissed_DeathWarning.pdf
Email thread between Polly Chromatic and WCC’s Kirsty Hornal, in which the parent states that institutional pressure is causing life-threatening asthma exacerbations. Kirsty replies about a broken Google Drive link. No medical response. No safeguarding escalation. Just bureaucracy.

I. What Happened

The subject line says it all:

“You will cause my death with all your harassment of me.”

This isn’t a metaphor. It’s a medical fact.
The parent is disabled, diagnosed, and deteriorating.
The emails are triggering asthma, panic attacks, and physiological collapse.
The verbal pressure is killing her.

And what does Westminster do?

Kirsty Hornal writes back about:

  • A broken hyperlink

  • How her “IT” couldn’t access a file

  • And whether the court application was filed yet

The death risk was ignored.
The diagnosis was invisible.
The person was admin.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That Westminster had direct knowledge of lethal medical escalation

  • That the named officer replied without referencing the risk

  • That disability adjustments (written-only contact) were still ignored

  • That procedural distraction was deployed as a containment tactic

  • That this is not miscommunication — it’s malpractice

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because this is the email that confirms it: Westminster doesn’t protect disabled people — it drives them into crisis, and then takes attendance.

SWANK archived this because:

  • It captures a death warning, ignored in writing

  • It preserves the digital trail of medical collapse as procedural failure

  • It reveals how neutral language is used to erase emergency

  • It is the moment Westminster social work became a contributing factor to lethal risk

This isn’t silence. It’s procedural violence in lowercase.

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010
    • Section 20: Failure to accommodate medical disability
    • Section 27: Harassment via email pressure
    • Section 149: Duty to eliminate harm breached

  • Human Rights Act 1998
    • Article 3: Inhuman or degrading treatment
    • Article 8: Respect for private life and health

  • Children Act 1989 – Institutional endangerment of parent directly affecting child welfare

  • Social Work England Standards –
    • Inaction in the face of medical risk
    • Failure to act transparently, safely, or responsibly

V. SWANK’s Position

This isn’t “poor communication.” It’s a deliberate act of flattening — reducing a death warning to a technical glitch. When a parent begs for medical reprieve and the officer replies with a broken-link report, what’s happening is not misunderstanding — it’s dismissal. With consequences.

SWANK London Ltd. files this as a judicial-grade record of foreseeable harm, delivered to social services in writing, ignored in plain view.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments: