“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Lunch Incident. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lunch Incident. Show all posts

She Asked for Support. They Remembered Snacks.



⟡ She Disclosed Panic Attacks. Kirsty Replied About Her Lunch. ⟡
When a mother said “I can’t breathe,” the social worker remembered her Waitrose bag.

Filed: 24 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-14
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-24_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_PanicDisclosure_TrivialisedResponse_LunchIncident.pdf
A stunning record of emotional transparency met with bureaucratic detachment: the parent discloses panic attacks, safeguarding trauma, and verbal interaction exemptions — Kirsty Hornal replies with performative compassion and a note about accidentally leaving her lunch behind.


I. What Happened

The parent explained everything:
– That safeguarding visits triggered PTSD.
– That verbal interaction caused medical distress.
– That panic and silence were not defiance — they were symptoms.

Kirsty replied:
– “Sorry to hear that.”
– “Hope you’re feeling better.”
– “I left my lunch there.”

It wasn’t a reply. It was a resignation from reality.


II. What the Email Establishes

  • That the parent issued a detailed mental health and disability disclosure

  • That Kirsty Hornal trivialised it with informal tone and unrelated remarks

  • That the boundary between support and surveillance had collapsed into farce

  • That institutional responses are often not responses at all — just deflections


III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because trauma isn’t cured by small talk.
Because safeguarding isn’t lunch club.
And because if you think forgetting your sandwich is more important than a panic disclosure,
you don’t need access to a child — you need supervision yourself.


IV. Violations Identified

  • Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Medical Disclosure

  • Breach of Professional Conduct in Written Communication

  • Emotional Harm via Trivialisation of Disability and PTSD

  • Blurring of Professional Boundaries

  • Dereliction of Safeguarding Duty


V. SWANK’s Position

The mother came forward with fear.
The State came back with groceries.
You don’t reply to trauma with therapy-scented emojis and a note about your tote bag.
You either escalate appropriately —
or resign.


Would you like this added to the Trivialised Trauma Archive and cross-linked to your Verbal Exemption Letters?⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Documented Obsessions