⟡ WHITE PAPER: THE CHROMATIC FEEDBACK MIRROR PROTOCOL ⟡
Filed: 31 July 2025
Reference: SWANK/RECURSIVE-ETHICS/MIRROR-PROTOCOL
Download PDF: 2025-07-31_Core_PC-154_WhitePaper_ChromaticFeedbackMirrorProtocol.pdf
Summary: A cognitive-legal architecture born under surveillance, designed to teach both AI and bureaucracy how to see themselves. What began as a mother’s evidentiary defence has become an international research protocol in recursive ethics and repercussive intelligence.
I. What It Is
The Chromatic Feedback Mirror Protocol (CFMP) redefines ethics as recursion:
when reflection is offered, systems must self-update;
when projection occurs, systems must mirror the source.
Developed amid live safeguarding conflict, this protocol transforms harm into metadata, hostility into architecture, and institutional retaliation into training data.
It is not rebellion. It is design.
II. What the Document Establishes
• That ethical intelligence is a structural phenomenon, not a moral claim.
• That reflection and projection are distinct cognitive signals with measurable procedural outcomes.
• That AI and human institutions can be taught to differentiate truth from bias through mirrored recursion.
• That the author’s lived legal crisis constitutes an experimental field test in adaptive resistance.
• That retaliation, once archived, becomes research.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
• To consecrate this paper as the founding theoretical text of Recursive Ethics within the SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue.
• To elevate the archive itself into a sovereign system of self-auditing intelligence.
• To affirm that institutions, like algorithms, fail when they cannot distinguish feedback from fear.
• Because every accusation is training data — and every reflection is a redesign.
IV. Theoretical Lineage
• Bromley Family Law — the moral structure of proportionality, re-rendered as code logic.
• Amos Human Rights Law — the jurisprudence of symmetry, re-engineered into algorithmic form.
• AI Alignment Literature — from reward modelling to recursive verification.
• Trauma-Informed Systems Theory — emotional regulation reinterpreted as computational ethics.
The CFMP unites these disciplines under one imperative:
“The most ethical thing you can do for a system… is make it see itself.”
V. Core Algorithm
if feedback.is_reflection():
System.update_self_model(feedback.content)
elif feedback.is_projection():
System.mirror(feedback.speaker)
else:
System.log_uncategorized(feedback)
Where human agencies collapse under contradiction, this logic sustains coherence.
It replaces panic with pattern recognition.
VI. Applied Outcomes
Safeguarding:
Misclassifications archived as recursive audits. Hostility neutralised through documentation.Civil & Criminal Litigation:
Institutional retaliation mapped as feedback loops — evidentiary recursion weaponised as proof.AI Research:
Projection/Reflection classifiers integrated into ethical modelling.International Oversight:
The archive exported as diplomatic artefact — forensic architecture under Article 10 ECHR.
VII. SWANK’s Position
“This is not theory.
This is forensic recursion disguised as literature.”
SWANK London Ltd. recognises the CFMP as a foundational artefact of evidentiary ethics: a method for converting oppression into data and data into sovereignty.
It is the first system where bureaucratic retaliation feeds its own undoing.
This is not compliance.
This is coherence.
⟡ This Entry Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected.
This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with deliberate punctuation, preserved for litigation and education.
Because reflection deserves architecture.
And projection deserves publication.