Why My Body Literally Rebels When You Enter the Room.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 2 February 2025
ON THE PATHOLOGY OF IRRESPONSIBILITY: AN IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Asthma Trigger Documentation · Social Worker Aversion Reflex · Bureaucratic Panic Induction · Irresponsibility Syndrome · SWANK Behavioural Pathogen Memo

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Philip Reid, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rhiannon Hodgson, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Annabelle Kapoor, Samira Issa, Glen Peache
Cc: alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc, Nannette Nicholson
Bcc: Documented on the astral plane.

---

🧪 THE MOST DANGEROUS VIRUS I KNOW: IRRESPONSIBILITY

“Social workers are the most consistently irresponsible group of people I’ve ever met.”

Not undertrained.
Not underpaid.
Irresponsible—willfully, institutionally, and without consequence.
Where others bring professionalism, you bring a pathogen.

---

😤 PHYSIOLOGICAL OUTCOME: ASTHMA. PANIC. DISGUST.

“The lack of accountability and the pervasive irresponsibility cause me asthma attacks and panic attacks.”

This isn’t metaphor.
This is a medical reaction.
Your visits, your delays, your bureaucratic theatre—all of it lands in my lungs.
You are not “providing care.”
You are a walking aerosol of neglect.

---

🚫 THIS IS A BOUNDARY. NOT A REQUEST.

“I’m tired of being forced to have these irresponsible people in my home and in my life.”

If your presence makes me sick, your absence is treatment.
I don’t need support. I need quarantine—from you.

---

📎 ADDENDUM: I DO NOT SPEAK. I DO NOT PHONE. I WILL NOT REPEAT.

“Please note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

It’s not a preference.
It’s an adjustment.
And if you can’t handle typing, you’re unfit to safeguard anyone—especially the chronically unheard.

---

Polly Chromatic
Allergic to misconduct. Unvaccinated against bureaucratic ineptitude.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Symptoms Recorded.

---

Why Bureaucratic Incompetence is Literally Gasping-for-Air Material

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 2 February 2025
ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IRRESPONSIBILITY
Also Filed As: "Administrative Allergy and the Case of the Wheezing Plaintiff"

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Social Worker Irresponsibility · Panic-Inducing Bureaucracy · Asthma Exacerbation · Administrative Allergy · SWANK Disgust Index

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Philip Reid, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rhiannon Hodgson, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Annabelle Kapoor, Samira Issa, Glen Peache
Cc: alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc, Nannette Nicholson

---

🤧 I’M ALLERGIC TO IRRESPONSIBILITY. LITERALLY.

“The lack of accountability and the pervasive irresponsibility cause me asthma attacks and panic attacks.”

Your names are not on the medication.
But your negligence is in the bloodstream.
You are no longer professionals.
You are airborne irritants—credentialed and chemically destabilising.

---

🧍🏽‍♀️ I DON’T WANT YOU IN MY HOME. I DON’T WANT YOU IN MY AIR.

“I’m tired of being forced to have these irresponsible people in my home and in my life.”

This is not a tantrum.
This is a triage response.
When the so-called service enters the premises, so do the symptoms.
Your visits constitute an environmental hazard.

---

📎 I CAN’T SPEAK. I SHOULDN’T HAVE TO REPEAT MYSELF.

“Please note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

If you require phonation to comprehend safeguarding,
you are categorically unfit for the job.
Refusal to accommodate is not oversight—it is malpractice.

---

Polly Chromatic
Disgusted. Documented. Disqualified from silence.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Symptoms Prosecuted.

---

You Call It Concern. We Call It a Respiratory Virus Every Time You Knock.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 4 February 2025
WE AREN’T “RESISTANT TO SERVICES.” YOU’RE RESISTANT TO DIAGNOSIS.
Also archived as: “Pathogen Theatre in the Disguised Form of a Welfare Visit.”

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Medical Harassment · Eosinophilic Asthma · Social Worker Contamination · Institutional Denial · Disability Erasure · SWANK Immunocompromised Archives

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid, aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc
Bcc: Phil @ Sangye Yoga

---

🧬 RESPIRATORY COLLAPSE IS NOT “PARENTAL NON-COOPERATION.”

“Every time a social worker comes in our home we are all sick for the next two to four weeks with a respiratory virus.”

This is not a metaphor.
This is viral epidemiology dressed up as safeguarding.
You arrive in lanyards and leave as vectors.

---

📚 THIS ISN’T SUPPORT. IT’S SYSTEMIC VANDALISM.

“Homeschooling, work, social activities, and my kids’ classes have all been negatively affected by your insistence on continuing to interfere…”

Your presence subtracts from every sphere of life.
You’ve weaponised bureaucracy into a domestic pollutant.

---

🩺 TEN YEARS OF MEDICAL EVIDENCE. DENIED BY CLIPBOARD.

“I have stated repeatedly that we all suffer from eosinophilic asthma… you have all refused to take me seriously.”

The condition is real.
The documentation is plentiful.
The disbelief is manufactured.

---

📎 VERBAL REFUSAL REMAINS LEGALLY BINDING.

“Please note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

This is not a preference.
It is a protected adjustment.
Your continued disregard is a breach—medically and legally.

---

Polly Chromatic
Immunocompromised. Impeccably documented. Immune to bureaucratic gaslighting.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Contagion Logged.

---

Ten Years of Damage for a False Suspicion You Can’t Let Go Of.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 4 February 2025
YOUR VISITS CAUSE RESPIRATORY COLLAPSE. YET YOU KEEP KNOCKING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Eosinophilic Asthma · Viral Contamination · Medical Negligence · Social Work Harassment · Disability Refusal · Home Intrusion Records · SWANK Immune System Collapse Chronicle

---

📩 To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Gideon Mpalanyi, Rachel Pullen, Eric Wedge-Bull, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid
Cc: Ministry of Health, Turks and Caicos
Bcc: Phil @ Sangye Yoga

---

💌 “INTERVENTION”? WE CALL IT CONTAMINATION.

“Every time a social worker comes in our home we are all sick for the next two to four weeks with a respiratory virus.”

What you term a “home visit” registers, medically, as pathogenic incursion.
You are not helping. You are shedding.
Your safeguarding theatre releases more illness than insight.

---

🫁 ASTHMA IS A DIAGNOSIS—NOT A DEBATE TOPIC.

“I have stated repeatedly that we all suffer from eosinophilic asthma…”

And yet: no protective protocol, no clinical precaution, no intellectual humility.
You respond to eosinophils with clipboard cynicism.
Asthma isn’t invisible—it’s merely ignored when inconvenient.

---

🗓 TEN YEARS. ZERO OUTCOMES. COUNTLESS INFECTIONS.

“Your investigations never end… they have wasted ten years of our lives.”

You’ve replaced education with disruption.
You’ve buried truth beneath paperwork.
You’ve built careers atop my children's breathlessness.

All while declaring yourselves “helpful.”

---

📎 VERBAL INTERACTION = DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION

“I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

It’s not a quirk. It’s a legal boundary.
If you cannot accommodate the medically necessary,
you are not conducting a visit—you are performing a breach.

---

Polly Chromatic
Respiratorily persecuted. Bureaucratically stalked. Legally notifiable.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Contaminants Prosecuted.

---

Why My Lungs Burn When You Talk About Safeguarding.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 4 February 2025
TOXIC GAS, SOCIAL GASLIGHTING, AND THE TEN-YEAR PLAN TO IGNORE US

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Sewer Gas Poisoning · Institutional Harassment · Respiratory Disability · Safeguarding Theatre · Medical Disbelief · Telepathic Correspondence · SWANK Environmental Health Dispatch

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Simon O'Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid, alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc
Bcc: phil@sangyeyoga.com

---

💨 WE WERE POISONED. YOU MISDIAGNOSED. THEN ESCALATED.

“We all suffered from sewer gas poisoning in October of 2023 and went to the hospital to be treated, where I was attacked by hospital staff five times over six months instead of being treated.”

You saw chemical exposure and inferred behavioural deviance.
You replaced toxicology with prejudice.
And you called it safeguarding.

---

🔁 SICK FROM THE SYSTEM, THEN SICK FROM YOU

“You escalated the case based on the fact that I was so sick at the time that I could barely breathe or talk…”

Rather than assist, you doubled down.
Rather than apologise, you investigated.
You interpreted collapse as non-compliance—and brought more bacteria.

---

🧠 IF YOU REFUSE TO READ, DON’T BLAME ME FOR NOT SPEAKING

“I suffer from a disability… I prefer to communicate telepathically… however, email is fine.”

This is not eccentricity. This is reasonable adjustment.
Refusal to accommodate is not a clerical oversight—it’s unlawful.

---

📎 THE REPORT YOU NEVER COMMISSIONED

Hydrogen sulfide. Methane. Ammonia. Carbon dioxide.
Result: Neurological insult. Respiratory trauma. Systemic dismissal.

Instead of intervention, you offered interrogation.
Instead of empathy, escalation.

---

Polly Chromatic
Poisoned, prosecuted, pathologised—never pacified.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Toxins Tracked.

---

When You Harass a Family Across Nations, Expect to Be BCC’d Into a Record.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 11 February 2024
RE: CHROMATIC FAMILY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM — FORMALLY CIRCULATED.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Cross-Agency Harassment · Discrimination Record · Council Abuse · NHS Complicity · Education Surveillance · Caribbean-UK Targeting · SWANK Ceasefire Dossier

---

To:

Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, Hardeep Kundi
Cc: NHS PALS, Council Complaints, School Administrators, Environmental Health, International Observers
Bcc: Literally Everyone Who Has Ever Doubted My Sovereignty

---

📝 THIS IS A BCC-LEVEL DECLARATION.

“Please see attached letter.”
“My children and I want to enjoy our lives in peace and are tired of being discriminated against and harassed.”

If you received this, it’s not a mistake.
It’s a final courtesy before international escalation.

---

👑 THIS CLAIM FORMALLY NAMES:

• Polly Chromatic (b. 16.01.1980)

• Regal Chromatic (b. 01.05.2009)

• Prerogative Chromatic (b. 03.01.2012)

• Kingdom Chromatic (b. 06.09.2014)

• Heir Chromatic (b. 30.04.2017)

The children bear sovereign names.
The treatment they’ve received belongs in colonial case law.

---

📎 ATTACHED AND ARCHIVED:

The original discrimination claim—served, submitted, and now engraved in the public record.

You had:

• Ample time to resolve this.

• Ample access to evidence.

• Ample warnings.

You chose surveillance over support.
Now you join the SWANK archive.

---

Polly Chromatic
Legal Archivist. Matriarch under siege. Sovereign of the Subject Line.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Retaliation Recorded.

---

The Child Protection Plan Reads Like a Parody

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: “What Are We Worried About?” Apparently… Everything.

🗓️ 15 March 2024
Distributed the day after the conference. Noelle’s breath had still not returned.

Filed Under: child protection escalation, Section 47 theatre, mental health surveillance, homeschooling panic, father contact obsession, RBKC procedural mimicry, institutional redundancy, over-visit strategy, disability erased

---

“Children to be seen and deemed safe.”
By whom?
Against what metric?
And using what evidence of harm?”
— Polly Chromatic, subject of a plan written by people who haven’t met her

---

This Conference Outline Plan, distributed on 15 March 2024, outlines Westminster City Council’s official child protection response to... a mother who homeschools, writes too well, and breathes irregularly due to asthma.

Among the stated “worries”:

• Mental health concerns raised vaguely by unnamed health professionals, neighbours, and hotel staff

• No contact with the children’s father, despite no safeguarding concern related to him

• Home education conducted without “professional oversight”

• Children not regularly seen by professionals, despite their excellent health

---

📌 I. The Plan as Bureaucratic Performance

Concern	Required Action	Translation
Mental health questions	Polly must undergo assessment	“We’re uncomfortable with her tone.”
Homeschooling structure	Education team must inspect home	“We don’t control your teaching, so we must control your house.”
No father contact	Must provide contact details	“We’re building a network of informants.”
Children not seen by professionals	Mandatory social worker visits every 10 days	“Your success without us is suspicious.”

---

🧠 II. Safety Goals or Surveillance Goals?

The “safety goals” are laughably generic:

• “Children to be seen and deemed safe in the home”

• “Polly to access support”

• “Father to be contacted”

There is no evidence of harm, no incident outlined, and no grounding in actual safeguarding thresholds. What exists instead is institutional projection — an assumption that home education, articulate language, and medical documentation are signs of danger.

---

🧾 SWANK Commentary

When a document this vague
is used to justify state intrusion,
you are no longer operating
under child protection law.

You are rehearsing a role
called “concern.”

A role that requires
no evidence,
no logic,
and no familiarity
with the family in question.

---

The Social Worker Who Investigated My Illness Instead of Accommodating It

---

⟡ When Medical Complaints Become Safeguarding Threats ⟡

Filed: 19 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/SWE/ISSACOMPLAINT-2025
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-19_SWANK_SWE_Complaint_SamiraIssa_SafeguardingRetaliation_DisabilityBreach_EthicsViolation.pdf

---

I. The Social Worker Who Investigated My Illness Instead of Accommodating It

This regulatory complaint to Social Work England (SWE) documents the conduct of Samira Issa, whose professional actions include:

• Refusal to honour written-only disability adjustment

• Escalation of safeguarding concerns in retaliation for lawful medical complaints

• Initiation of procedural contact during documented respiratory crises

• Breach of trauma-aware practice despite direct clinical evidence

She was not assigned to protect.
She was assigned to pressure — and did so with full administrative fluency.

---

II. What She Was Told. What She Ignored.

Ms Issa was made aware of:

• Eosinophilic Asthma and speech restrictions

• Formal written-only contact policies

• Previous trauma linked to social services

• Active medical complaints under investigation

Yet:

• She escalated without cause

• Initiated verbal outreach during known nonverbal phases

• Deployed "concern" as cover for reputational clean-up

This wasn’t safeguarding.
It was reputational retaliation scripted in pastel tone.

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because medical harm should not trigger family investigation.
Because silence is a form of protection — and breaking it is an act of violation.
Because “just doing my job” ceases to be a defence when your job is systemic violence with a lanyard.

Let the record show:

• The disability was known

• The adjustment was denied

• The family was targeted

• And SWANK — filed it all, in regulator-ready language

This wasn’t care.
It was administrative cruelty written in “concern.”

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept safeguarding referrals triggered by lawful complaint.
We do not permit social workers to bypass disability law.
We do not allow silence to be pathologised.

Let the record show:

A mother was punished for being ill.
A child was endangered by “support.”
A social worker escalated without ethics.
And SWANK — filed it for archive, citation, and eventual tribunal.

This isn’t professional misconduct.
It’s formatted retaliation — and we named the author.

---

---

---