“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

The Social Worker Who Investigated My Illness Instead of Accommodating It


⟡ When Medical Complaints Become Safeguarding Threats ⟡

Filed: 19 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/SWE/ISSACOMPLAINT-2025
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-19_SWANK_SWE_Complaint_SamiraIssa_SafeguardingRetaliation_DisabilityBreach_EthicsViolation.pdf

I. The Social Worker Who Investigated My Illness Instead of Accommodating It

This regulatory complaint to Social Work England (SWE) documents the conduct of Samira Issa, whose professional actions include:

  • Refusal to honour written-only disability adjustment

  • Escalation of safeguarding concerns in retaliation for lawful medical complaints

  • Initiation of procedural contact during documented respiratory crises

  • Breach of trauma-aware practice despite direct clinical evidence

She was not assigned to protect.
She was assigned to pressure — and did so with full administrative fluency.

II. What She Was Told. What She Ignored.

Ms Issa was made aware of:

  • Eosinophilic Asthma and speech restrictions

  • Formal written-only contact policies

  • Previous trauma linked to social services

  • Active medical complaints under investigation

Yet:

  • She escalated without cause

  • Initiated verbal outreach during known nonverbal phases

  • Deployed "concern" as cover for reputational clean-up

This wasn’t safeguarding.
It was reputational retaliation scripted in pastel tone.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because medical harm should not trigger family investigation.
Because silence is a form of protection — and breaking it is an act of violation.
Because “just doing my job” ceases to be a defence when your job is systemic violence with a lanyard.

Let the record show:

  • The disability was known

  • The adjustment was denied

  • The family was targeted

  • And SWANK — filed it all, in regulator-ready language

This wasn’t care.
It was administrative cruelty written in “concern.”

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept safeguarding referrals triggered by lawful complaint.
We do not permit social workers to bypass disability law.
We do not allow silence to be pathologised.

Let the record show:

A mother was punished for being ill.
A child was endangered by “support.”
A social worker escalated without ethics.
And SWANK — filed it for archive, citation, and eventual tribunal.

This isn’t professional misconduct.
It’s formatted retaliation — and we named the author.




No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.

Documented Obsessions