⟡ Addendum: On the Economics of Suffering and the Fiscal Grammar of Grief ⟡
Filed: 5 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/HIGH-COURT/PC-089
Document: 2025-05-05_Core_PC-089_HighCourt_ProofOfFinancialLosses.pdf
Summary: Proof of Financial Losses submitted to the High Court — a dossier in which arithmetic performs lamentation, each subtotal a sigh, each receipt a rebuke.
I. What Happened
On 5 May 2025 the claimant, armed with nothing but receipts and righteous composure, itemised catastrophe. This was not bookkeeping; it was biography told through numbers. Loss of earnings, housing upheaval, pharmacy receipts, and the priceless cost of composure were all tallied until dignity itself became line five.
II. What the Document Establishes
That money is the official language of disbelief.
That trauma must be translated into currency before it can be heard.
That the spreadsheet, when properly weaponised, is a moral instrument.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because precision is its own form of protest. SWANK recognises this submission as a work of forensic poetics — proof that bureaucracy can be met with balance-sheet sonnets.
IV. Violations
Equality Act 2010 – disability accommodations ignored, invoiced retroactively.
Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 8 violations, priced per night of displacement.
Administrative Negligence – now quantifiable.
Compassion – missing, uncosted.
V. SWANK’s Position
These figures do not seek pity; they demand interest. Each pound sterling represents the bureaucratic conversion rate of endurance. SWANK commends the claimant for achieving what economists could not: turning empathy into evidence.