“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label safeguarding opacity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safeguarding opacity. Show all posts

You Scheduled a Meeting Without Telling Me Why

 ⟡ SWANK Procedural Absurdity Dispatch ⟡


28 February 2024

The Most Opaque Invitation Ever Sent to a Mother of Four


Labels: unexplained conference, ICPC misconduct, safeguarding theatre, RBKC opacity, parent rights breach, SWANK correspondence

—

I. The Email That Confirms They Have Nothing to Say

On 28 February 2024 at 10:05am, Rhiannon Hodgson (Case Conference Coordinator, RBKC) emailed Noelle Bonneannée to:

  • Invite her to an Initial Child Protection Conference

  • Regarding Honor, King, Prince, and Romeo Bonne Annee

  • Scheduled for Monday, 4 March at 10:30am

  • Location: Malton Road Hub, W10

Included: a Parent’s CPC Form.
Not included: any statement of concern, allegation, or reasoning.

—

II. Noelle’s Response: Elegant Disbelief
At 10:59am, Noelle replies via iCloud Mail, Bcc’ing Nannette Nicholson as record-keeper:

“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children. It would be nice if someone could inform me.”

No anger.
No escalation.
Just a gentle decimation of their credibility.

—

III. An Invitation to Be Judged Without a Charge Sheet
This isn’t procedural caution—it’s parental ambush:

  • No allegations laid out

  • No opportunity to respond prior

  • No transparency about cause or trigger

  • No explanation for why all four children are included

This is not safeguarding. It is administrative suspicion in search of substance.

—

Filed under:
ICPC absurdity, parental rights breached, safeguarding opacity, RBKC misadministration, SWANK email archive

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. If they won’t tell you the concern, it’s because they know it wouldn’t hold up.

No comments:

A Meeting About My Children—Without Any Stated Reason

⟡ SWANK Conference Dispatch ⟡

28 February 2024

If There’s a Concern, Why Has No One Shared It?

I. A Meeting Invitation—Missing Its Premise

On 28 February 2024, Rhiannon Hodgson, Case Conference Coordinator for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), issues a formal letter to Polly Chromatic:

You are invited to attend a Child Protection Conference regarding Regal, Prerogative, Kingdom & Heir on Monday 4 March at 10:30am, at the Malton Road Hub.

Attached: a CPC preparation form.
Absent: any explanation of what the concern actually is.

No allegations. No incident. No cause.
Just a scheduled event demanding presence and submission — without basis.

II. Polly’s Response—Elegant and Devastating

Sent the same morning, timestamped 10:59, from noellebonneannee@me.com, Bcc’d to Nannette Nicholson for institutional memorialisation:

“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children.”
“It would be nice if someone could inform me.”

That is the entire response.
A sentence with more dignity than the entire procedure.
A legal haiku of parental defiance.

III. The Pattern: Protecting Children From… What, Exactly?

This is not safeguarding.
This is administrative theatre without a script.

To date, Polly had:

  • Provided documentation

  • Repeatedly stated her boundaries

  • Responded to every referral

  • Requested clarity multiple times

And yet — RBKC schedules a multi-child protection meeting with no allegation, no trigger, and no procedural legitimacy.

This isn’t protection.
It’s harassment by calendar invite.

📂 Filed under:

protection without premise, safeguarding opacity, child conference performance, parental rights violation, SWANK email rebuke, RBKC procedural breakdown

🔎 Search Description:

RBKC invites parent to child protection conference without stating concern. SWANK response exposes institutional absurdity in one sentence.

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
If they can’t tell you what you’ve done wrong, you probably haven’t.

No comments: