“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label social work obsession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social work obsession. Show all posts

This Has Already Been Addressed. Repeating It Is Harassment.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024
STOP ASKING. I’VE ALREADY ANSWERED.

Filed Under: Disability Disregard, Referral Repetition, Social Work Obsession, Institutional Harassment, Verbal Coercion Refusal, RBKC Misconduct


To: Samira Issa, Kensington & Chelsea Social Work Department
From: Noelle Meline, Medically Restricted / Legally Fortified


I will say this in progressively smaller fonts until the silence arrives:

I CANNOT BREATHE.

I CANNOT SPEAK ON THE PHONE.

I ALREADY RESPONDED.

I ALREADY RESPONDED.
I. ALREADY. RESPONDED.

You are now pursuing a fourth request for verbal contact regarding an incident that occurred on 2 January 2024 — an incident that has already been:

  • Documented

  • Discussed

  • Answered

  • Replied to in writing

  • Escalated to legal review

There is no new information.
There is no new incident.
There is no reason to contact me again.


Yet here we are.

With you asking again:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”

As if my medical conditions are optional.
As if your emails are therapeutic.
As if my lungs are your scheduling tool.


Let’s review what you’ve chosen to ignore:

“I cannot breathe.”
“I cannot talk on the phone.”
“I will not stress my lungs by speaking.”
“This same issue has already been addressed by social services.”
“Nothing new has happened.”
“You are wasting my time.”
“Leave me alone.”


Your behaviour now constitutes:

  • Repeated contact against medical advice

  • Retaliatory safeguarding initiated after formal complaints

  • Refusal to honour disability adjustments under the Equality Act 2010

  • Emotional harm caused by persistent disregard and coercive tactics


You are not supporting.
You are not safeguarding.
You are provoking collapse in a medically compromised woman with four children.


Cease all further contact.
This is your final notice.
All correspondence is now part of an active legal file.


Noelle Meline
Voice withheld. Boundaries enforced.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com


Labels: harassment, disability breach, statutory failure, written mandate ignored, safeguarding retaliation, exhausted mother, RBKC disgrace, repeated referrals, forced escalation, social work obsession, No means No

Referral Roulette: Social Services’ Favourite Game



⟡ SWANK Rebuttal Dispatch ⟡

When They Call Again for What You've Already Answered
9 February 2024

No Means Documented: A Formal Refusal of Phone Harassment


I. The Referral Loop That Violates Logic and Law

This dispatch concerns a formal reply from Polly Chromatic to Samira Issa of RBKC Children’s Services, following yet another redundant referral—this time made by Chelsea & Westminster Hospital.

The subject?

An incident that:

  • Occurred on 2 January 2024 at St. Thomas’ Hospital

  • Was already reported and discussed

  • Already inflicted documented trauma

“They are referring me for the same incident that I’ve already spoken with you about.”

This is not procedure. This is institutional memory loss weaponised as policy.


II. A Refusal Grounded in Health and Rights

This is not avoidance. It is medical boundary enforcement.

Polly—diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma—makes the legal and clinical position plain:

  • Verbal contact is contraindicated

  • Phone calls exacerbate her condition

  • Repeated contact for the same matter constitutes harassment

“I am concerned about your mental health given that you continue to harass me for the same things over and over…”

This is not safeguarding. This is a fixation masquerading as duty.


III. Legal Action and Documentation

Polly informs Ms. Issa that:

  • She has retained legal representation for a medical negligence claim

  • She intends to pursue legal action for continued safeguarding harassment

  • She has already submitted documentation—three named attachments covering Erik, Eric, and Rebecca

Her concluding instruction?

“Please refrain from contacting me again.”

The tone is not rude. It is final.




© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
The repetition of a question already answered is not concern—it is coercion.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy



Documented Obsessions