“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Fiona Dias-Saxena. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiona Dias-Saxena. Show all posts

When a Child Collapses, He Replies with Procedural Theatre.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 18 February 2024
GLEN RESPONDED—BUT ONLY TO DOWNPLAY THE DAMAGE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Glen Peache · Post-Collapse Dismissals · NHS Gaslighting Partnership · Email Delays · Council Blame Redirection · SWANK Institutional Failure Index


To:

Glen Peache
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Relevant Medical Neglect Units


🧾 YOUR “RESPONSE” ARRIVED ONLY AFTER A CHILD COLLAPSED.

“Thank you for your email. I am sorry to hear about your experiences at the hospital and your daughter’s health.”
“Please let me know how you would like me to respond.”

She collapsed.
You emailed.
And somehow still positioned yourself as passive recipient of instruction, rather than a safeguarding officer tasked with preventing medical catastrophe.


🫁 YOUR NHS PARTNERS NEARLY KILLED HER. YOU PASSED THE COMPLAINT TO THEM?

“We would advise discussing any safeguarding concerns you may have directly with the hospital via their complaints or PALS service.”

This is not a hospital review.
It is an incident of interagency neglect.
And your response confirms a pattern of bureaucratic outsourcing in the face of respiratory collapse.


πŸ“© THIS IS NOT A BACK-AND-FORTH. IT’S AN EVIDENCE TRAIL.

You are not waiting for my “instruction.”
You are being archived—for lethargy in the face of crisis.
Each polite delay will be used in court to evidence structural gaslighting.


Polly Chromatic
Chronically right. Systemically dismissed. Noted accordingly.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Inactions Logged.



Prednisone Was Prescribed, But Disdain Was Delivered.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
SHE WAS COLLAPSING. YOU GAVE HER ANTIBIOTICS—AND NOTHING ELSE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Paediatric Medical Neglect · Prednisone Panic · NHS Collapse Rituals · Chest X-Ray Denial · Telepathic Clarifications · SWANK Respiratory Abuse Archive


To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson


πŸ§’πŸ½ HEIR’S TREATMENT TIMELINE—IF ONE DARES CALL IT THAT:

“The hospital didn’t do a chest x-ray.”
“Put Honor on a second antibiotic.”
“Said to give prednisone.”
“Told me to follow up with the GP.”

Diagnosis? None.
Compassion? Missing.
Prescriptions? Abundant.

A checklist masquerading as care.
She was in collapse, and they were performing protocol theatre.


🫁 THE AFTERMATH WAS PHYSICAL—FOR BOTH OF US:

“Now I can’t breathe after that experience—and I was breathing well before.”
“We just got home.”

Medicine should not require recovery from the visit itself.
But with the NHS, harm is not a side effect. It’s the main event.


🩺 THE EXCEPTION THAT PROVED THE INSTITUTIONAL RULE:

“I would have rather just had Dr Reid do it all…”
“I don’t blame him for their ignorance.”
“Thank you, Dr Reid.”

There are still doctors who understand dignity.
They just don’t seem to be staffing A&E.


πŸ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (IGNORED, AS ALWAYS):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

They ignored the scan.
They ignored the breath.
They ignored the patient.
But the archive will not ignore them.


Polly Chromatic
Breath held. Truth released.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Omissions Filed.



You Let My Daughter Collapse So You Could Blame Me for Breathing Wrong.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
THEY WOULDN’T EVEN DO A CHEST X-RAY. THEN THEY GAVE HER TWO ANTIBIOTICS.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Paediatric Asthma Mismanagement · Medical Gaslighting · Hospital Abuse · Prednisone Protocol · GP Deflection · NHS Incoherence · Telepathic Access Denial


To:

Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson


πŸ§’πŸ½ HONOR’S MEDICAL TIMELINE (ABUSE-ADJACENT):

“The hospital didn’t do a chest x-ray.”
“They did finally treat Honor in a short stay room after the doctor abused me.”
“They put her on a second antibiotic.”
“Told me to give her prednisone and albuterol every four hours.”
“Told me to follow up with a GP.”

What they lacked in investigation,
they made up for in prescriptions.


🩺 THE MOTHER HAD DATA. THE SYSTEM HAD DISDAIN.

You dismissed the evidence.
You bypassed the scan.
You outsourced diagnosis to a GP you hadn’t even consulted.
And then had the audacity to insult my access needs.


πŸ’¨ SHE WAS BREATHING BEFORE. COLLAPSING AFTER.

“We just got home.”
“Now I can’t breathe—and I was breathing well before.”
“I’m so disgusted with the hospitals.”

This isn’t post-care fatigue.
It’s systemic injury disguised as treatment.


🫢🏽 ONE PROFESSIONAL, ONE NOTE OF GRACE:

“I would have rather just had Dr Reid do all of it.”
“Thank you so much, Dr Reid.”

The rest acted like my daughter’s chest was a theory.
He treated it like a reality.


πŸ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (REPEATED AD NAUSEAM):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Still ignored. Still lawful. Still binding.
If you can’t accommodate, you can’t assess.


Polly Chromatic
Mother, analyst, witness—reporting live from the breathless state of care.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breaths Counted.



The Only Adjustment We’re Asking For Is Oxygen, Not Opinion.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE DON’T HAVE TIME TO ARGUE. WE’RE TOO BUSY BREATHING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Disability · Verbal Assault · Hospital Gaslighting · Adjustment Refusal · Child Medical Neglect · NHS Argument Addiction · Telepathic Justice · SWANK Clarification Mandate


To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health


πŸ—£ WHAT I SAID—IN BREATHS, NOT BARKS

“I don’t appreciate the way they treat us when we go to the hospital unable to breathe—when we can’t defend ourselves verbally.”
“All they want to do is argue.”
“We don’t have time or respiratory capacity to do that.”
“To make matters worse, after they abuse us, everyone blames me. And when my kids get older, they will be treated the same way unless it changes now.”

This is not reluctance.
It’s triage by necessity.
When survival is breath-counted, debate is malpractice.


⚠️ THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION. IT’S A DIAGNOSIS

“We cannot have a discussion and argument about whether or not we are really unable to breathe.”
“All they needed to do was check Honor. But they wanted to argue instead.”

What passes for protocol in your institution is indistinguishable from obstruction.


🧠 BREATH-BASED ACCESS, NOT BUREAUCRATIC THEATRE

“I don’t want to discuss it beyond the basic facts. But even repeating the same basic facts repeatedly is too much for my lungs.”
“They ought to be providing adjustments so that I don’t need to speak to them at all—let alone argue.”

You were not hired as cross-examiners.
You were employed to protect.
Start there.


πŸ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (NEVER HONOURED, NOW ARCHIVED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Yet your system continues to demand breath over bandwidth.


Polly Chromatic
My lungs aren’t for your suspicion. My speech isn’t for your sport.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Adjustments Filed.



Apparently, That’s Offensive.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE DON’T ARGUE. WE BREATHE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Verbal Hostility · Hospital Gaslighting · Disability Disrespect · Child Medical Neglect · A&E Verbalism · Respiratory Mismanagement · SWANK Defence of Breath


To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health


πŸ“£ WHAT I SAID (NOT THAT THEY LISTENED):

“I don’t appreciate the way they treat us when we go to the hospital unable to breathe—when we can’t defend ourselves verbally.”
“All they want to do is argue.”
“We don’t have time or respiratory capacity to do that.”

The last thing a mother should need in the A&E is rhetorical stamina.
Yet this system insists on performance—over pulse, posture, or protocol.


πŸ‘ΆπŸ½ ON BEHALF OF MY DAUGHTER:

“It’s very straightforward. All they needed to do was check Honor.”
“But they wanted to argue about it instead.”

This isn’t a failure to understand.
It’s a refusal to accommodate—deliberate, rehearsed, and increasingly cruel.


πŸŒ€ SYSTEMIC ABUSE, THEN BLAME:

“After they abuse us, everyone blames me.”
“And when my kids get older, they will be treated the same way unless it changes now.”

You’ve confused safeguarding with antagonism.
And weaponised authority against the breathless.


🧠 VERBAL EFFORT IS A PRIVILEGE, NOT YOUR ENTITLEMENT:

“It’s exhausting for us to do simple things like talk.”
“Apparently other people can talk more easily because they waste it on arguing.”
“We only talk when it’s meaningful.”

We do not owe you discourse.
We owe our lungs oxygen, not defence.


πŸ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (ETERNALLY NEEDED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Verbalism is not care. It is coercion.
And we document every syllable you try to extract unlawfully.


Polly Chromatic
Archiving the violence of disbelief. Refusing to breathe for your benefit.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Inhales Indexed.



Three Problems, One Condition, No Compassion.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE JUST WANT TO BREATHE—NOT BE BLAMED FOR EXISTING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Disbelief · Respiratory Torture · Social Rejection · Asthma Isolation · Telepathic Clarity · NHS Hostility · School Gaslighting · Chronic Misunderstanding · SWANK Testimonial Evidence File


πŸ“ To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Harley Street Mental Health, Nannette Nicholson


❌ THREE RECURRING INSTITUTIONAL FAILURES:

  1. Defensive hospital staff who treat symptoms as accusations.

  2. Protocol defiance and diagnostic laziness, dressed in lanyards.

  3. Gaslighting as standard—“We don’t believe you” as a care plan.

Dr Arjumand repeated—several times—“I don’t believe you,”
while I was visibly, audibly, physiologically struggling to breathe.
My children watched. No one intervened. Again.


🫁 THE LONGEST SYMPTOM: DISBELIEF

“My whole life, I’ve had to explain my inability to breathe—and still not be believed.”
“From classrooms to clinics, I’ve been called dramatic, then blamed for being right.”
“Now my children are punished for their lungs, and I’m vilified for defending them.”

There is no gas stronger than medical contempt.
And no inhaler for institutional ego.


πŸ‘ HUMANITY REQUIRES MIRRORING—NOT SURVEILLANCE

“Blind people have blind friends. Deaf people have deaf friends.
Even racial communities seek mutual comfort.”
“We want friends who breathe like us. Who understand what it means to survive the air.”
“I breastfed all four of my children to prevent this illness. They got it anyway.
And they are still the only ones who understand me.”

This isn’t martyrdom. It’s physiology.
And you’re not listening. You’re watching with a clipboard.


πŸ’‘ OUR REQUESTS (WRITTEN, AS ALWAYS):

  • Respect the written access adjustment.

  • Treat us without interrogation.

  • Stop requiring verbal performance to access care.

  • Believe the data, not your mood.

  • Stop punishing asthmatic existence.


πŸ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT: STILL VALID. STILL IGNORED.

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

This is not ambiguity.
This is refusal to perform your preferred pantomime of health.


Polly Chromatic
Mother of four. Truth-teller by breath. Refuser of bureaucratic delusion.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disbelief Cross-Examined.



When Breathing Is Treated Like a Social Offence.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE MOVED FOR FRIENDSHIP. YOU GAVE US ASTHMA SHAME.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Asthma Discrimination · Social Misreading · Community Hostility · Verbal Disability · British Allergy to Vulnerability · Snobbish Expat Testimony · SWANK Statement on Medical Intolerance


πŸ“¨ WHAT I WROTE (AND YOU MISREAD):

“We felt isolated in Turks and Caicos and came here because we love the people and socialising…”
“However people here don’t like that we have asthma.”
“It’s like you are all angry at us for having asthma. Period. That’s how we feel.”
(But we feel better now that you are all helping.)

The irony, of course, is that you were never helping.
You were reacting—to our breath, our boldness, our refusal to perform wellness for your comfort.


πŸ’¨ A BREATHING OFFENCE IN A NATION OF SIDE-EYES

I arrived under the illusion that the UK was a place of civility and inclusion.
Instead, I found a kingdom where asthma is treated like insolence—
and breathlessness is met with bureaucratic punishment.

You whisper behind clipboards.
You raise eyebrows at oxygen monitors.
You blame the disabled for disrupting your illusion of order.


🧠 STILL TELEPATHIC. STILL DISMISSED.

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

And still—
I must explain my lungs.
Justify my sentences.
Rationalise my silence.
To those who claim to support.


πŸ“Ž CONCLUSION:

We moved for friendship.
We got forms.
We came for inclusion.
We got inspection.
We sought community.
We found clinical disdain.

Polly Chromatic
Expatriate of Hope. Archivist of Breath-Based Rejection.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathings Monitored. All Silences Filed.



The United Kingdom of Respiratory Resentment.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE MOVED HERE TO SOCIALISE. YOU MADE US SICK.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Asthma Stigma · Social Exclusion · Disability Discrimination · Verbal Adjustment Ignored · Hostility by Health Status · Snobby Expat Observations · SWANK Sovereignty Log


πŸ’¬ FROM THE RECORD (AND STILL NOT READ):

“We felt isolated in Turks and Caicos and came here because we love the people and socialising…”
“…however people here don’t like that we have asthma.”
“It’s like you are all angry at us for having asthma. Period. That’s how we feel.”
(But we feel better now that you are all helping.)

How British.
The nation that prides itself on queues, etiquette, and empathy—
couldn’t stomach a child with a nebuliser.


πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ A VERY BRITISH IRONY:

We left the tropics for community.
Instead, we found shame with side-eye.
Here, you’re punished not for speaking too loudly—
but for breathing too audibly.

Asthma became our accent.
And you made it foreign.


🧠 ACCESS STATEMENT (REPEATED IN EVERY EMAIL, IGNORED IN EVERY ROOM):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

But in Westminster’s elite social script:

– Inhalers are uncouth
– Telepathy is impolite
– Email is invisible
– And asthma is a personal offence

We asked for community.
You offered performance notes.


Polly Chromatic
Moved for connection. Received bureaucracy. Documenting every exhale.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
πŸ“§ director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Stigmas Archived. All Illnesses Public.



If You Refuse to Treat Us, At Least Do It Quietly.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I CAN’T ARGUE. I’M BREATHING. PICK ONE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Endangerment · A&E Hostility · Medical Gaslighting · Child Treatment Refusal · Verbal Disability · NHS Bullying · SWANK Pre-Litigation Catalogue

To: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Doyenne of Telepathic Correspondence


πŸ’¬ THE LINES THEY STILL PRETEND NOT TO HEAR:

“No one will tell me what the ‘erratic’ behaviour was, given that I’ve only said I want treatment and can’t argue due to respiratory strain.”
“When a woman in the waiting area was abusing me, they blamed me.”
“All the hospitals share the same hatred and ignorance of asthma.”
“They refuse to treat my kids more than they refuse to treat me.”
“I’m going to sue them. It’s child neglect.”


🧠 VERBAL AUSTERITY STATEMENT:

I do not argue.
I breathe.

If you want to help—help.
If you don’t—move.
I will not waste oxygen proving my suffering to those who monetise disbelief.


🧬 ACCESS STATEMENT (STAMPED, SENT, IGNORED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Every refusal is now a receipt.
Every conversation denied is a case number pending.


πŸ“Ž PRE-SUIT REMINDER:

You refused access.
You denied medical care.
You blamed me for needing it.

And now you’re logged.
Publicly. Permanently. Procedurally.

Polly Chromatic
Gaslit, blamed, untreated—and now suing.
πŸ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com


Search Description:
A&E refused to treat asthmatic mother and children, then blamed them for needing care. Polly Chromatic files pre-litigation documentation.

Labels:
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Philip Reid, NHS asthma refusal, St Thomas’, St Mary’s, Chelsea & Westminster, A&E abuse, verbal disability, child neglect, SWANK legal threat file

Refusing Adjustments Isn’t a Mystery—It’s Abuse.



πŸ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

YOU’VE IGNORED ME FOR A YEAR. SO DON’T PRETEND TO BE CONFUSED.

Also titled: “The Twelve-Month Breathless Farce.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic, Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Filed Under: NHS Litigation Docket · Respiratory Neglect · Disability Adjustment Breach · A&E Hostility · Written-Only Mandate · Public Body Stonewalling · SWANK Exhaustion Index


🫁 THREE STATEMENTS THAT OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT—EVEN FOR YOU:

“Your hospitals refuse to treat us when we go to A&E due to ignorance about asthma.”
“You all refuse to provide adjustments when we are compromised verbally.”
“No one will give me the hospital’s perspective and I’ve been asking for this for an entire year.”

Twelve months of legally sound, clinically grounded written notice.
In return: silence, avoidance, and ritualised incapacity.


🧠 TRANSLATION (FOR THE PROFESSIONALS WHO REQUIRE REPEATED INSTRUCTION):

I am asthmatic.
My children are asthmatic.
We attend A&E.
You withhold treatment.
I invoke disability law.
You demand verbal performance.
I explain.
You loop.
I cite.
You erase.

This is not safeguarding.
This is slow-motion sabotage in bureaucratic costume.


πŸ—£ ACCESS STATEMENT (LEGALLY DECLARED, SOCIALLY DISMISSED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You turned a lawful accommodation into a compliance test.
You failed.


πŸ“Ž CLOSING ENTRY IN THE BREATHLESS LEDGER:

You withheld care.
You refused access.
You looped me for a calendar year.
You rebranded medical trauma as procedural confusion.

I do not owe you another syllable.
You owe me twelve months of rectification—and a permanent entry in the archive.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy



They Forwarded the Distress — Not the Protection.



⟡ “We Flagged Harm. They Filed It as Admin.” ⟡

Westminster Service Manager Forwards Urgent Health and Safeguarding Complaint to Complaints Team, Ignoring Disability and Risk Disclosure

Filed: 18 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-08
πŸ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-02-18_SWANK_Email_FionaDiasSaxena_ReferralToComplaints_UrgentHealthDisclosure.pdf
Summary: Fiona Dias-Saxena responds to Polly Chromatic’s urgent safeguarding and health complaint by referring the matter to Westminster’s complaints department — no clinical action or risk intervention followed.


I. What Happened

On 17 February 2025, Polly Chromatic submitted a letter titled “Urgent Concerns Regarding Health and Social Worker Conduct” to Sarah Newman and others.
On 18 February, Fiona Dias-Saxena replied:

“I have included your attached note to the Complaints Team to respond to you.”

She copied:

  • RBKC’s FCS Response Team

  • Kirsty Hornal (named in the complaint)

  • Sarah Newman (Director)

There is no mention of safeguarding reassessment, risk strategy, or communication adjustment.


II. What the Record Establishes

• Your urgent disclosure was downgraded to an administrative complaint
• The Service Manager acknowledged the letter but did not act on its contents
• Kirsty Hornal — the subject of the complaint — was cc’d without conflict check
• There was no escalation to clinical review, even though the email was cc’d to NHS (Philip Reid)
• This reinforces the claim that Westminster used the complaints route to suppress safeguarding failings


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because sending a trauma disclosure to the complaints team is like sending smoke to a filing cabinet.
Because when risk is visible and ignored, it becomes institutional negligence.
Because this was a test — and they failed it by routing it to admin.

SWANK archives every time a safeguarding failure was disguised as bureaucracy.


IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that urgent health risks belong in the complaints inbox.
We do not accept that cc’ing the named staff counts as due process.
We do not accept that emotional and medical distress is a filing category.

This wasn’t customer service. It was a duty of care failure.
And SWANK has the email to prove it.


This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


Documented Obsessions