Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): RBKC overreach

Showing posts with label RBKC overreach. Show all posts

I Withdrew from the System Because the System Withdrew from Me

⟡ SWANK Trust Termination Notice ⟡

20 February 2024

You Don’t Get to Fail Me and Still Call It Support

I. The Line That Severs the Cord

Sent from director@swanklondon.com at 08:57 GMT, this dispatch from Polly Chromatic delivers a surgical severance to Samira Issa, and—by carbon copy—to every institution complicit in her mistreatment:

“I am not interested in your support or that of Guys’ and St Thomas’ hospital or Westminster and Chelsea hospital as you have all betrayed my trust (several times) and shown me that you are not trustworthy at all.”

There is no elaboration.
No justification.
Just precision, delivery, and closure.

II. Copied for the Record, Not for Discussion

Cc’d:

🏥 Chelsea & Westminster Complaints
🏥 CWPALS
🏥 Guys & St Thomas’ Complaints
🗂️ Eric Wedge-Bull
📁 RBKC Complaints
🧾 Glen Peache

Bcc’d:

💼 Nannette Nicholson (for legal witnessing and archival inclusion)

This was not an invitation to dialogue.
It was a notification of revocation, archived on arrival.

III. Closure Is Not Silence—It’s Precision

This is not a cry for help.
It is a disengagement notice issued with clarity.

Polly does not seek to be “heard.”
She writes to ensure she can never again be misquoted.

This is not mutual trust ending—it is a unilateral correction of false assumption.

🏷️ Court Labels:

revoked trust, medical betrayal, safeguarding collapse, Chelsea & Westminster, GSTT misconduct, RBKC overreach, SWANK closure dispatch

(Total: 178 characters) ✅

🔍 Search Description (under 150 characters):

Polly Chromatic terminates all trust in RBKC, GSTT, and C&W. No further contact invited. Institutions formally dismissed.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

No Time for You. Only for My Children.

⟡ SWANK Boundary Dispatch ⟡

9 February 2024

Final Clarification. No Further Clarification Required.

I. A Mic Drop in Six Lines

In this final communiqué to Samira Issa and Eric Wedge-Bull of RBKC Children’s Services, Polly Chromatic issues a boundary—not a dialogue.

“I’m not going to discuss anything on the phone. I don’t have time for you. I only have time for my children.”

This is not evasion.
This is value alignment.
The hierarchy is simple:
Children > Bureaucracy.
Health > Harassment.
Time > Theatrics.

II. A Refusal Wrapped in a Download

With elegant finality, Polly resends the Kalisa Douglas file—already submitted, already ignored, already archived.

She has answered
She has documented
She has retained counsel

She is done.

No further clarification is required because none was ever read.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

She Couldn’t Breathe, So They Made Her Repeat Herself. Again.

📎 SWANK Dispatch: Repetition as Retaliation — We've Already Been Assessed

🗓️ 3 March 2024

Filed Under: repeated assessments, recycled allegations, RBKC child protection abuse, respiratory discrimination, Section 47 misuse, Samira Issa misconduct, safeguarding as punishment, police and hospital cleared, social work overreach, verbal coercion of disabled parent

“We did this already.
Twice.
You just didn’t like the outcome.”
— Polly Chromatic, chronically ill mother facing a third assessment for the same 2022 concerns

In this terse, precise letter dated 3 March 2024, Noelle Meline addresses the sustained institutional harassment led by Samira Issa, social worker at RBKC, who escalated a case based on medically-triggered communication difficulties and already-resolved allegations from 2022.

Despite:

A full assessment in November 2022
A second full assessment in June 2023
No action by police
No findings by hospital staff
And documented health conditions impairing her ability to speak

Samira continues to escalate based on claims that have already been addressed — and disproven.

📄 I. A Breakdown of the Pattern

Nurses: “We have no concerns.”
Then: “She may be intoxicated.”
Then: “She left the children alone.” (She didn’t.)
Now: “Concerns from 2022.” (Addressed. Twice.)

And all of it ignored the fact that Polly was acutely ill and had informed them repeatedly that she could not speak.

🧠 II. Her Children Are Educated — That's the Problem

They are homeschooled across global curricula
They engage regularly in cultural and community activities
They have already discussed sensitive topics in past assessments — including family history

But that intellectual sovereignty appears to be threatening to systems that thrive on compliance.

🧾 SWANK Commentary

Disability became a reason
to question her parenting.
Intelligence became a reason
to assume danger.
Repetition became
institutional punishment.

When you demand that a breathless mother
repeat herself for the third time —
you’re not safeguarding.
You’re interrogating.