⟡ SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue
Filed Date: 17 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-NHSRES-ACKNOWLEDGMENT
PDF Filename: 2025-07-17_SWANK_LiabilityTransfer_NHSResolutionAcknowledged.pdf
1-Line Summary: Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust has formally escalated Polly’s £88M civil claim to NHS Resolution, confirming official legal risk recognition.
I. What Happened
On 16 July 2025, Sandra West — legal officer for Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust — issued a formal reply to Polly Chromatic’s multi-defendant N1 civil claim, stating that the case has been handed to the Trust’s legal insurer: NHS Resolution.
This procedural transfer was not simply clerical.
It marked the moment the Trust formally acknowledged:
the validity and seriousness of Polly’s legal action,
the potential institutional liability it exposes,
and the scale of public interest risk it now carries.
The case is now assigned to Olivia Pearce (NHS Resolution), with case reference M25CT541/011.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
The civil claim filed by Polly Chromatic outlines:
Medical negligence (oxygen deprivation, dysphonia, safeguarding harm)
Retaliatory behaviour by social care bodies, solicitors, and medical staff
Multi-institutional collusion
Psychological, physical, and procedural harm spanning years
The Trust’s decision to forward this to NHS Resolution is a legal gesture of liability awareness, not just a forwarding of mail.
It shows the Trust knows it is not in a position to deny, deflect, or casually discard the evidence.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
This event establishes:
A formal turning point in civil procedure
That the weight of the claim is being taken seriously
That Polly, as a litigant in person, has succeeded where full legal teams often falter
SWANK London Ltd. is logging this moment to document the pattern of:
Legal systems folding once proper documentation is presented
Institutions shielding themselves with insurers when truth becomes too sharp
IV. Violations
The original claim names 23 defendants, including:
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Westminster and RBKC Children’s Services
The Metropolitan Police
CPS
Kirsty Hornal, Sam Brown, Alan Mullem, Dr. Reid, and others in their personal and/or professional capacities
Primary violations alleged:
Disability discrimination
Medical negligence
Safeguarding misuse
Institutional retaliation
Suppression of parental rights
This NHS acknowledgment implicitly accepts the seriousness of these allegations.
V. SWANK’s Position
When a Trust forwards a claim to NHS Resolution, it ceases to posture as innocent.
It becomes, procedurally, a defending party. That distinction matters.
It signals that the harm alleged is:
Legally arguable
Medically traceable
Procedurally potent
SWANK London Ltd. asserts that the NHS Trust’s action — taken on record — confirms that Polly Chromatic’s legal voice carries enough weight to activate institutional insurance mechanisms.
The velvet letterhead has been received. The clock is ticking.
⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.