A Transatlantic Evidentiary Enterprise — SWANK London LLC (USA) x SWANK London Ltd (UK)
✧ Filed with Deliberate Punctuation ✧
“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Data Protection Enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Data Protection Enforcement. Show all posts

In re: Westminster City Council’s Service Misadventures and the Unauthorized Audience of Mothers


Service Email Clarification & Courtly Compliance

(In the Matter of M03CL193, Central London County Court)

Metadata

I. What Happened

Westminster’s Legal Services, in their infinite sloppiness, continued to dispatch sealed court orders to Ms. Chromatic’s personal email—an address openly monitored by her mother. The effect: a family court order, meant to be treated with confidentiality, slipped into the domestic inbox like supermarket spam.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

That the Local Authority, despite a clear judicial order of 12 September 2025, has:

  • Failed to restrict service to the mandated address.

  • Disclosed sealed proceedings to an unauthorised third party.

  • Embarrassed itself by violating both the Court’s authority and Article 5(1)(f) UK GDPR in one breathless motion.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because the Local Authority must be reminded that compliance is not elective.
Service is not a parlour game.
And confidentiality is not a quaint suggestion.

IV. Violations

  • Breach of Central London County Court Order (M03CL193) — failure of service compliance.

  • Unlawful third-party disclosure — personal email monitored by non-parties.

  • UK GDPR, Article 5(1)(f) — flagrant disregard of confidentiality and integrity principles.

V. SWANK’s Position

The Local Authority has until 12:00 sharp, the following day to:

  1. Remove the personal email from every record, list, and system.

  2. Re-serve all documents since 12 September 2025 to director@swanklondon.com.

  3. Confirm its penance in writing.

Failure will trigger a formal enforcement application, accompanied by SWANK’s ceremonial filing fanfare.

Filed with deliberate punctuation and gold-toned contempt by SWANK Legal Division, on behalf of Polly Chromatic.


⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Subject Access Request – Request for Full Disclosure of Personal Data Held by RBKC


🦚 Subject Access Request – Request for Full Disclosure of Personal Data Held by RBKC

Filed under the documentation of data rights assertion, administrative accountability, and constitutional expectation.

12 March 2025
To:
The Information Management Team
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC)
Email: DataProtection@rbkc.gov.uk

Subject: Subject Access Request – Request for Full Disclosure of Personal Data Held by RBKC

📜 Dear Information Management Team,

I write to you in the full and formal exercise of my rights under:

  • The UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR);

  • The Data Protection Act 2018,

to submit a Subject Access Request (SAR) for all personal data held by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) relating to myself.

I trust that, despite past institutional experience,
this request will be met with the dignity, discretion, and efficiency owed to the public it serves.

📚 Details of the Data Subject

  • Full Name: Polly Chromatic

  • Date of Birth: 16 January 1980

📜 Scope of Request — Full and Unabridged Disclosure Requested

I hereby request complete copies of all personal data held about me, specifically including:

✔ All records held by RBKC Social Services — assessments, case notes, professional correspondence;
✔ All interdepartmental communications referencing me — emails, minutes, internal memos;
✔ All safeguarding discussions, decisions, and referrals concerning my case;
✔ All correspondence involving social workers, managers, consultants where I am referenced;
✔ A full list of third parties to whom my data has been disclosed, including the legal bases for such disclosures.

Should any material be withheld,
I expect a precise legal justification citing specific exemptions under the Data Protection Act 2018 —
not procedural obfuscation.

📚 Preferred Format for Disclosure

  • Electronic format via email

  • For accessibility, archival integrity, and speed of delivery.

Should an alternative be deemed necessary, I expect proposals to be submitted without delay.

📜 Verification of Identity

I am prepared to provide verification documents promptly upon request.
Kindly specify:

  • Which documents are required;

  • How they should be transmitted securely.

Let us hope such verification does not become an administrative oubliette.

📬 Response Timeframe

Under Article 12(3) UK GDPR, you are obligated to respond:

  • Within one calendar month of receipt.

I request written confirmation of:

  • Receipt of this request;

  • The timeline for full disclosure.

📜 Closing Remarks

I thank you — with cautious optimism — for your attention to this matter.

One expects that a borough bearing such an esteemed postcode
will aspire to match its geography with procedural excellence.

📜 Yours sincerely,

Polly
No comments: