“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label SWANK environmental archive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SWANK environmental archive. Show all posts

Why My Lungs Burn When You Talk About Safeguarding.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 4 February 2025
TOXIC GAS, SOCIAL GASLIGHTING, AND THE TEN-YEAR PLAN TO IGNORE US

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Sewer Gas Poisoning · Institutional Harassment · Respiratory Disability · Safeguarding Theatre · Medical Disbelief · Telepathic Correspondence · SWANK Environmental Health Dispatch

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Annabelle Kapoor, Laura Savage, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Simon O'Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Eric Wedge-Bull, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Rhiannon Hodgson, Samira Issa, Glen Peache, Philip Reid, alsmith@gov.tc, aaforbes@gov.tc
Bcc: phil@sangyeyoga.com

💨 WE WERE POISONED. YOU MISDIAGNOSED. THEN ESCALATED.

“We all suffered from sewer gas poisoning in October of 2023 and went to the hospital to be treated, where I was attacked by hospital staff five times over six months instead of being treated.”

You saw chemical exposure and inferred behavioural deviance.
You replaced toxicology with prejudice.
And you called it safeguarding.

🔁 SICK FROM THE SYSTEM, THEN SICK FROM YOU

“You escalated the case based on the fact that I was so sick at the time that I could barely breathe or talk…”

Rather than assist, you doubled down.
Rather than apologise, you investigated.
You interpreted collapse as non-compliance—and brought more bacteria.

🧠 IF YOU REFUSE TO READ, DON’T BLAME ME FOR NOT SPEAKING

“I suffer from a disability… I prefer to communicate telepathically… however, email is fine.”

This is not eccentricity. This is reasonable adjustment.
Refusal to accommodate is not a clerical oversight—it’s unlawful.

📎 THE REPORT YOU NEVER COMMISSIONED

Hydrogen sulfide. Methane. Ammonia. Carbon dioxide.
Result: Neurological insult. Respiratory trauma. Systemic dismissal.

Instead of intervention, you offered interrogation.
Instead of empathy, escalation.

Polly Chromatic
Poisoned, prosecuted, pathologised—never pacified.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Toxins Tracked.


No comments:

Complaint Received. Consequences Undelivered.


⟡ “Thank You for Contacting Us. That’s All For Now.” ⟡
The Environment Agency Acknowledges Receipt of a Formal Complaint — But Offers No Immediate Substance

Filed: 22 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/ENVAGENCY/EMAIL-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-22_SWANK_Email_EnvironmentAgency_ComplaintAcknowledgement.pdf
Summary: Auto-reply acknowledging receipt of a formal complaint to the Environment Agency, with a stated aim to respond within three working days.

I. What Happened

On 22 May 2025, the Environment Agency's National Complaints and Commendations Team acknowledged your complaint submission. The reply confirmed:

– Receipt of your complaint
– A commitment to respond within three working days (excluding holidays/weekends)
– Reference to their Customer Service Commitment

No case reference, summary, or personnel assignment was provided. The complaint itself — and any outcome — remains unacknowledged in substance.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• The Environment Agency received and logged your complaint
• A response deadline was implied but not enforced
• No engagement with content, urgency, or case-specific elements was offered
• This marks the beginning of the response clock, which can be used to hold the agency accountable for delays or omissions
• The format and tone reflect a wider trend: automated civility in place of institutional substance

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because an acknowledgement without follow-up is a stall in soft form.
Because timing matters — and this is now a baseline timestamp against which future silence can be measured.
Because the inbox reply is often the only proof that a complaint even entered the system.

SWANK documents not only what was said — but what wasn’t said, and when it should have been.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that complaints can be acknowledged and then ignored.
We do not accept that institutional transparency ends with a receipt.
We do not accept that civility replaces accountability.

This wasn’t a response. This was a placeholder.
And SWANK will log every one of them.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions