“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label CEDAW. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CEDAW. Show all posts

When National Redress Fails, We File With Geneva


⟡ “If the State Fails, the Archive Escalates.” ⟡
SWANK Submits Shadow Report to United Nations: Documenting Systemic UK Violations Against a Disabled Mother and Her Children

Filed: 31 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/UN/EMAIL-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-31_SWANK_Email_UNRapporteurs_ShadowReport_DisabilitySafeguardingRetaliationUK.pdf
Summary: SWANK formally submits a shadow report to the UN outlining systemic disability discrimination, retaliatory safeguarding, medical neglect, and intersectional harm within the UK child protection system.

I. What Happened

On 31 May 2025, Polly Chromatic (Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett) submitted a shadow report to three UN entities:
– Special Rapporteur on Disability
– Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women
– Urgent Action desk at OHCHR

The report alleges violations of:
– The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
– The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
– The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

It details:
– Refused medical adjustments
– Procedural retaliation through child safeguarding channels
– Medical neglect by multiple NHS trusts
– Intersecting racism and ableism affecting both parent and children
– Institutional refusal to investigate or remedy

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• The UK has failed to provide medical access and procedural equity to a disabled parent
• Safeguarding structures are used as retaliatory levers — not protective frameworks
• Medical neglect is compounded by state narrative control and dismissal
• Oversight within the UK has failed — necessitating international attention
• SWANK functions as a public record and evidentiary vault in the absence of domestic protection

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is no longer just a complaint — it’s a case study in human rights denial.
Because when the state silences, the archive speaks internationally.
Because escalation to the UN is not an end — it’s a signal: we documented everything.
Because this was not just a report — it was a declaration of jurisdictional failure.

SWANK logs the moment the domestic system failed — and the global one was summoned.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that intersectional harm can be dismissed by internal process fatigue.
We do not accept that systemic failures can hide behind jurisdiction.
We do not accept that silence can survive documentation.

This wasn’t a report. This was an intervention.
And SWANK will publish every submission that says: the system saw, and still refused.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

When the Regulators Went Quiet, We Went Global. — A UN Shadow Report from the Archive


⟡ Shadow Report Filed with the United Nations: UK State Retaliation Documented ⟡

“They violated disability rights. They used safeguarding as reprisal. We sent it to Geneva.”

Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/UN/SHADOW-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_UN_ShadowReport_DisabilityGenderViolence_UKStateRetaliation.pdf
A formal shadow report submitted to the UN Special Rapporteurs on Disability, Violence Against Women, and the Urgent Action Unit. It details systemic safeguarding retaliation, disability-based access denial, and gender-targeted harm by UK state actors — including police, local councils, NHS Trusts, and regulators. SWANK documents the international dimension of domestic misconduct.

I. What Happened

On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, on behalf of Noelle Jasmine Meline Bonnee Annee Simlett, filed a shadow report with the United Nations, citing:

  • UK violations of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)

  • Systemic abuse of power under the guise of child safeguarding

  • Repeated breaches of a written-only medical adjustment

  • Institutional obstruction of legal, medical, and parental rights

  • Gender-based harm violating the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

  • Ongoing retaliation described as procedural, strategic, and state-sanctioned

The report also references:

  • A live Judicial Review in the High Court

  • Formal filings to PHSO, EHRC, ICO, IOPC, SWE, and Parliament

  • Medical harm and rights violations affecting four children

  • Archival documentation available at www.swankarchive.com

II. What the Report Establishes

  • That UK domestic mechanisms failed — prompting international escalation

  • That this is not an isolated incident, but a pattern of state retaliation

  • That the harm includes intersecting violations of disability, gender, and family rights

  • That the United Nations has now been notified, under shadow report authority

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when every regulator is silent,
When ombudsmen delay and courts narrow their scope,
And when retaliation is codified in the name of care —
The only option left is international exposure.

This isn’t lobbying.
It’s archiving.
And if the UN doesn’t act,
The record already has.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that safeguarding means silencing.
We do not accept that state actors can violate medical law without consequence.
We do not accept that a mother’s identity must be fractured to be heard.

SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the UK violates UN treaties,
We file a report.
If retaliation crosses borders,
We write the geography of harm.
And if no one reads it in Geneva —
They’ll read it here.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions