⟡ “Verbal Isn’t Required — But Accountability Is.” ⟡
A mother declares her disability in writing. The state responds with escalation, not accommodation.
Filed: 21 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-08
๐ Download PDF – 2025-02-21_SWANK_Email_Reid_ForcedSpeechRetaliation_DisabilityExemptionNotice.pdf
Polly Chromatic formally withdraws from all verbal communication due to documented asthma exacerbation and trauma injury, submitting this legal and medical declaration to Westminster social workers, their supervisors, and NHS clinicians. It was ignored — and then weaponised.
I. What Happened
Polly Chromatic — disabled mother, sole caregiver to four disabled U.S. citizen children — submitted this direct and clinical communication confirming that:
Verbal speaking triggers medical exacerbation
Institutional pressure to “speak” is discriminatory
All future communication must be written
She cited retaliation, coercion, and her medical exemptions.
She sent it to everyone.
Westminster responded with even more surveillance, more unscheduled visits, and continued refusal to comply.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
A clear clinical boundary was documented, timestamped, and distributed
That boundary was not respected
Professionals involved included safeguarding, legal, and medical staff
No written reply was issued; the parent was punished instead
The institutional aim was not to support — it was to provoke
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because when a disabled mother says “This is harming me,”
and the state says “Say it louder” — that’s abuse.
Because refusing to speak isn’t defiance — it’s survival.
Because if silence is your right, then retaliation is their crime.
IV. Violations
Breach of Section 20 & 21 Equality Act (Failure to make reasonable adjustments)
Medical harassment through forced verbal interaction
Safeguarding retaliation for documented disability disclosures
Breach of Articles 3 and 8 ECHR (inhuman treatment, private life)
Failure to implement clinical protections acknowledged by NHS consultant
V. SWANK’s Position
Polly declared her limits.
They saw those limits as a challenge.
This email is not a request — it’s a line.
And every violation past this line is now recorded.
Forever.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.