⟡ “I Was Doing Better — Until She Made Me Speak.” ⟡
Health collapses. Again. Because Kirsty Hornal couldn’t read a sentence.
Filed: 15 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-32
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-15_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_ForcedSpeechSymptomFlare_ReidSavageNotice.pdf
Polly Chromatic was recovering — until another verbal ambush from Kirsty Hornal set her back by weeks. This email, sent to solicitor Laura Savage and NHS consultant Philip Reid, documents the exact health impact of forced speech following documented, ignored disability warnings. It is quiet. Devastating. And unimpeachably clear.
I. What Happened
Polly Chromatic had communicated her limits.
Repeatedly.
In writing.
No verbal communication. Medically exempt.
Then Kirsty Hornal showed up and forced a conversation.
Result:
– Two to four weeks of post-encounter symptoms
– Loss of ability to socialise
– Inability to perform daily activities, like visiting the playground
– Emotional withdrawal and despair
And yet somehow,
Kirsty still thinks she’s “supporting” the family.
II. What the Email Establishes
That Polly was experiencing health improvement prior to forced verbal contact
That verbal speech caused medical regression, emotional injury, and isolation
That the professional in question was repeatedly informed in writing of communication boundaries
That both legal and medical professionals were directly alerted
That this pattern is not theoretical — it’s documented, predictable, and traumatic
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because institutional abuse isn’t always loud.
Sometimes it’s a “quick chat” that steals your lungs.
Because writing down what harms you shouldn’t result in it happening anyway.
Because being nice doesn’t excuse being harmful.
And because no one gets to call it “care” when it’s forced, known, and damaging.
IV. Violations Identified
Breach of documented verbal exemption and disability adjustment agreement
Disregard for mental and physical symptoms triggered by forced contact
Pattern of retraumatisation by a known actor (Kirsty Hornal)
Emotional withdrawal and reduced quality of life directly caused by professional behaviour
Institutional failure to intervene or de-escalate despite ongoing harm
V. SWANK’s Position
Polly was healing.
Then Kirsty came to talk.
Again.
The system always demands the same thing — voice.
Even when it’s the one thing she cannot give without breaking.
And every time they ask,
the cost is weeks of health,
days of silence,
and now —
one more file.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.