Negligent Kingdoms (noun, poetic collective)
Pronunciation: /ˈnɛɡ.lɪ.dʒənt ˈkɪŋ.dəmz/
1. Bureaucratic empires masquerading as civil service.
Structures of power where duty is diluted, decisions are delayed, and consequences are outsourced. Populated by paper-pushers, gatekeepers, and champions of plausible deniability.
2. In SWANKian usage:
The interconnected realms of social work, housing, healthcare, and law, where institutional neglect is not the exception but the infrastructure. These kingdoms thrive on passivity, jargon, and the strategic disappearance of accountability.
Characteristics:
- Policies with no practice
- Protocols with no empathy
- Outcomes with no ownership
- A talent for “looking into it” indefinitely
Etymology:
A SWANK-coined phrase to expose the myth of noble governance in systems built to delay, deflect, and deny. Not to be confused with actual monarchies, which at least own their crowns.
See also:
Standards, Whinging (reclaimed), Paper Warfare, Institutional Gaslighting, The Theatre of Safeguarding
Shall I prepare Paper Warfare next, or do you want a custom entry for The Grand Whinge?
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.