⟡ Procedural Contact: CNBC Acknowledged the Claim ⟡
Filed: 25 March 2025
Reference: SWANK/N1/CNBC/CLAIM-SUB-01
Author: Polly Chromatic
Jurisdiction: Civil National Business Centre (CNBC), HMCTS
📎 Download the Filing Email (PDF)
Formal N1 Claim Submission to CNBC – Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett v. Multiple Defendants
Includes full email header, timestamped metadata, and proof of lawful submission
I. The Email That Ended Pretence
At precisely 21:06 GMT on the evening of 25 March 2025, the Civil National Business Centre (CNBC) received what they could no longer ignore: a formal submission of claim, filed in the name of Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett, and lodged against multiple defendants for clinical negligence, discrimination, and procedural misconduct.
No ambiguity. No misplaced attachment. No excuse.
They received it. They were copied. And the clock began ticking.
II. Submission as Evidence, Not Request
In this jurisdictional ballet of bureaucratic foot-dragging and clerical vanishing acts, the email itself is a sword:
It affirms jurisdiction, initiates procedural responsibility, and renders any subsequent “miscommunication” legally suspect.
The address used — Applications.CNBC@justice.gov.uk — is not a customer service line. It is the door to litigation. And SWANK, with its velvet ledger, recorded the knock.
III. Archival Elegance: Why This Matters
This email marks the first moment of formal procedural engagement with the court. It is not merely administrative; it is jurisprudential theatre. The kind where silence from the other side isn’t discretion — it’s defeat.
For future reference, rebuttal, or reminder:
They knew. They were served. They proceeded anyway.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.