🪞SWANK London Ltd
LEGAL OBSTRUCTION & MISCONDUCT – PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
Filed Against Alan Mullem, Former Solicitor, MBM Crawford Street
Metadata
Filed Date: 29 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-AM-LOI-0729
Court File: 2025-07-29_CriminalProsecution_AlanMullem_LegalObstructionAndMisconduct.pdf
Summary:
SWANK formally files a private criminal prosecution against Alan Mullem for obstruction, misconduct, and dereliction of legal duty.
I. What Happened
Between 24 and 28 June 2025, solicitor Alan Mullem inserted himself into a live safeguarding crisis and promptly collapsed any remaining structure of procedural sanity. While purporting to act on behalf of the mother, he silenced her communication, withheld critical documents, gaslit her legal strategy, and failed to notify her of the Interim Care Order (ICO) hearing—at which her four U.S. citizen children were removed. His signature appears nowhere helpful. His presence accomplished nothing lawful.
Instead of protecting his client’s interests, Mr. Mullem actively dismantled them. He issued threatening emails. He sabotaged her filings. And in a move almost too on-brand for the legal theatre of child protection, he excused his failure to notify her of court by blaming her for not opening an envelope.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
This Laying of Information, submitted under Section 6 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, establishes the following allegations:
Misconduct in Public Office (Common Law)
Perverting the Course of Justice
Harassment (Protection from Harassment Act 1997)
Professional Negligence with Procedural Consequence
The evidence includes a curated catalogue of email threads, unreturned filings, and patronising sign-offs that would make any self-respecting advocate blush.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because this man told a disabled mother in crisis that she was “being silly” — while her children were unlawfully removed.
Because he refused to file or even read the applications she lawfully prepared.
Because his legal representation operated not as a shield, but as a sieve through which all procedural rights were drained.
Because in safeguarding law, misrepresentation is not just unethical — it is structural violence, and it enables institutional harm to proceed unchallenged.
IV. Violations
Failure to notify client of ICO hearing (24 June 2025)
Dereliction of legal duties under the Solicitors Code of Conduct
Procedural sabotage during active safeguarding crisis
Suppression of lawful filings and diplomatic notifications
Discriminatory failure to accommodate written-only communication
V. SWANK’s Position
We do not accuse Alan Mullem of being an ineffective solicitor.
We accuse him of being a catastrophically effective saboteur.
His actions — coordinated or careless — removed the last internal mechanism of legal protection. The prosecution is now formally filed, and the evidence is devastating. We will not restore public trust in safeguarding law until professionals like this are exposed, disqualified, and prosecuted accordingly.
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.