“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Respiratory Negligence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Respiratory Negligence. Show all posts

Edward, Kindly Put a Mask On Before You Infect a Medically Vulnerable Household Again.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 27 June 2024

YOU BROUGHT A STRANGER INTO MY HOME. NOW WE’RE ALL SICK.

Filed Under: Respiratory Negligence, Disabled Mother Harassment, Mask Refusal, Home Visit Etiquette, Children’s Services Contagion, Westminster Ignorance

📎 SUBJECT: Our Lungs Are Not Your Workplace

To: Edward (Surname unimportant. Contamination memorable.)
From: Polly Chromatic
Location: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London
Post-visit condition: Ill, again

“Following your recent visit with the second stranger you have brought into our home, we all have a respiratory virus.”

You brought a virus.
We provided politeness.
You offered no consent form, no mask, and no basic regard for health protocols in a medically vulnerable home.

🩺 FACTS FOR YOUR RECORD:

  • All four children and their mother are high-risk for respiratory infections

  • Diagnosed with eosinophilic asthma

  • Repeated documentation of post-visit illness from social worker intrusion

  • Maskless visits have previously led to hospitalisation and oxygen treatment

This is not a lifestyle preference.
This is disability law.
This is medical necessity.

😷 NEW MANDATE:

“From now on all visitors in our home need to wear masks for our safety.”

It is not a request.
It is a boundary, a legal precaution, and a reasonable adjustment under the Equality Act.

If you cannot comply, do not enter the home.

🧬 SYSTEMIC CONTEXT:

Let’s be honest, Edward —
you didn’t come for the children.
You came to check, sniff, observe, document, and expose.

And in doing so, you exposed a high-risk household to viral infection.
All while pretending your clipboard mattered more than their lungs.

🛑 FINAL WORD:

You now have written notice.
Should this happen again, it will be filed as medical negligence, disability discrimination, and institutional harassment.

Polly Chromatic
Not a patient. Not your subordinate. Not your scapegoat.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, respiratory virus, home visit negligence, Edward Westminster, social worker misconduct, mask mandate, vulnerable household, disabled parent, medically documented, legal notice given, SWANK health protocol, post-visit illness, safeguarding malpractice

No comments:

£2.1 Million in Damages for One Doctor’s Shrug


⟡ The Professor Who Let Me Suffocate ⟡

Filed: 1 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/GMC/BRANLEY-NEGLIGENCE
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-01_SWANK_GMC_Complaint_ProfHowardBranley_RespiratoryNegligence_DisabilityDismissal_£2.1MClaim.pdf

I. £2.1 Million in Damages for One Doctor’s Shrug

This formal complaint to the General Medical Council (GMC) documents the clinical negligence of Professor Howard Branley, a consultant respiratory physician who:

  • Ignored documented diagnoses of Eosinophilic Asthma

  • Failed to respond to repeated episodes of respiratory collapse

  • Refused to initiate safeguarding referrals after observing abuse markers

  • Breached ethical duty by erasing disability evidence at the point of care

His silence became a ventilatory risk.
His prestige became his alibi.

II. The Clinic Was a Courtroom. He Withheld the Defence.

Professor Branley’s actions included:

  • Withholding diagnoses despite clinical evidence

  • Mischaracterising a patient with known PTSD and dysphonia

  • Failing to protect a child present during critical appointments

  • Issuing no follow-up plan despite acute respiratory dysfunction

This was not forgetfulness.
This was procedural euthanasia of care — dressed in NHS letterhead.

He chose to believe policy over pulse oximetry.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because disability dismissal is not just medical error — it is a civil harm with clinical fingerprints.
Because when elite doctors enable procedural abuse through omission, litigation is the only second opinion that counts.
Because gaslighting a respiratory collapse is not a metaphor — it’s a claimable event.

Let the record show:

  • The negligence was recorded

  • The child witnessed it

  • The evidence was preserved

  • And SWANK — filed it with statutory demand and monetary notation

This wasn’t a missed referral.
It was medical abandonment in silk tie and consultant tone.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit medical hierarchies to override duty of care.
We do not accept diagnostic omission as a form of plausible deniability.
We do not believe that a professor’s letterhead justifies silence.

Let the record show:

The patient was disabled.
The child was endangered.
The doctor was informed.
And SWANK — filed for £2.1 million.

This isn’t a clinical error.
It’s a valuation of institutional failure — costed, formatted, and notarised.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions