“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label child neglect. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child neglect. Show all posts

I Don’t Argue. I Archive.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

“The Hospitals Refuse to Breathe With Us”

Filed Under: A&E Bullying · Medical Gaslighting · Child Neglect by Refusal · Verbal Abuse by Protocol · NHS Ignorance · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty,

“Yes, the hospital’s perspective is what I’ve been asking about for an entire year.”

And still, no reply. Because there is no perspective—only projection.

“No one will tell me what the ‘erratic’ behaviour was…”

Let me tell you what’s erratic:
Refusing to treat a woman with asthma because she can’t argue back.
Blaming her for being abused in your waiting rooms.
Treating her children with even less compassion than you afford her.

“That wasn’t the same hospital. That was St Thomas. This was St Mary’s.”

And yet… the cruelty is identical.
The oxygen denial is choreographed.

“I’m going to sue them. It’s child neglect.”

Yes. And medical misconduct. And procedural sabotage.

Because I do not scream.
I do not shout.

I document.
And I move legal systems with receipts, not rage.

“They either want to help or they don’t. It’s that simple.”
“If they don’t want to help, I document it online and move on.”

This is not a tantrum.
This is record-keeping in a hostile state.

I do not owe you performance.
I owe my children protection.

—

📍 Filed Post-Bullying, Pre-Litigation
Polly Chromatic, Verbal Refusal Archivist & NHS Historian-in-Residence
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Erasures Exposed.


No comments:

If You Refuse to Treat Us, At Least Do It Quietly.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I CAN’T ARGUE. I’M BREATHING. PICK ONE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Endangerment · A&E Hostility · Medical Gaslighting · Child Treatment Refusal · Verbal Disability · NHS Bullying · SWANK Pre-Litigation Catalogue

To: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Doyenne of Telepathic Correspondence

💬 THE LINES THEY STILL PRETEND NOT TO HEAR:

“No one will tell me what the ‘erratic’ behaviour was, given that I’ve only said I want treatment and can’t argue due to respiratory strain.”
“When a woman in the waiting area was abusing me, they blamed me.”
“All the hospitals share the same hatred and ignorance of asthma.”
“They refuse to treat my kids more than they refuse to treat me.”
“I’m going to sue them. It’s child neglect.”

🧠 VERBAL AUSTERITY STATEMENT:

I do not argue.
I breathe.

If you want to help—help.
If you don’t—move.
I will not waste oxygen proving my suffering to those who monetise disbelief.

🧬 ACCESS STATEMENT (STAMPED, SENT, IGNORED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Every refusal is now a receipt.
Every conversation denied is a case number pending.

📎 PRE-SUIT REMINDER:

You refused access.
You denied medical care.
You blamed me for needing it.

And now you’re logged.
Publicly. Permanently. Procedurally.

Polly Chromatic
Gaslit, blamed, untreated—and now suing.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com

Search Description:
A&E refused to treat asthmatic mother and children, then blamed them for needing care. Polly Chromatic files pre-litigation documentation.

Labels:
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Philip Reid, NHS asthma refusal, St Thomas’, St Mary’s, Chelsea & Westminster, A&E abuse, verbal disability, child neglect, SWANK legal threat file

No comments:

Breathless Is Not Unreasonable: How NHS Staff Abuse Disabled Families, Then Call Them Difficult


⟡ “I Don’t Fight Like a Wild Animal. I Email Until You Lose Your Job.” ⟡
Medical Neglect, Hospital Misconduct, and the Anatomy of Verbal Retaliation When You Can’t Breathe

Filed: 23 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-23_SWANK_Email_Reid_NHSMisconduct_ChildNeglectThreatReport.pdf
Email documenting abusive NHS conduct toward disabled parent and children, failed A&E procedures, and verbal disability assertion — with a formal threat to escalate publicly and legally.

I. What Happened

On 23 November 2024, Polly Chromatic sent a structured, blistering email to GP Philip Reid and a group of social services and legal recipients. It contained:

  • Dosage and health updates for multiple children (prednisone use)

  • Observations about neglectful NHS staff who mishandled intake tests

  • First-hand documentation of emotional and physical abuse in A&E settings

  • A written refusal to continue tolerating hospital-based maltreatment

When King’s lungs were visibly struggling, the staff told him to “breathe with his mouth closed,” and took his temperature by placing the device beside — not in — his ear.

And when Polly complained, they accused her of racism.

This was not a meltdown. It was a case file.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • Repeated NHS neglect of a disabled parent and her children

  • Mistreatment framed as clinical policy, not bias

  • Weaponised accusations (racism, non-compliance) used to deflect accountability

  • Disability dismissal: severe asthma and verbal impairment treated as irritants

  • Verbal retaliation criminalised, while institutional abuse remained protected

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because what gets called an “angry email” is often a legal archive in its purest form.

This message is strategic, evidentiary, and fully aware of the consequences. It does not plead — it indicts. Every sentence is an affidavit in disguise. Every word is a rebuttal to the fantasy that “reasonable” patients get treated fairly.

SWANK logged it because no parent should have to diagnose their own child while defending their legal right not to suffocate in silence.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This was not aggression.
It was survival, forwarded.

We do not accept that hospitals can fail four children and then ask for politeness.
We do not accept that accusations of racism erase acts of clinical cruelty.
We will document every time a parent was forced to write their own discharge summary because the state refused to care.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

We Asked for Help with Sewer Gas. You Threatened Removal. Now We’re Litigating.


⟡ We Were Sick. You Watched. Now We're Filing. ⟡
“The children were coughing from sewer gas. You asked about bedtime instead.”

Filed: 14 December 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAILS-16
📎 Download PDF – 2024-12-14_SWANK_EmailStatement_WCC_NeglectSewerGasAbuse_LegalActionDeclared.pdf
A formal statement of lived harm, institutional denial, and declared legal action sent to Westminster Children’s Services following months of ignored illness and retaliatory safeguarding.

I. What Happened

On 14 December 2024, the parent sent a conclusive statement to Westminster Children’s Services, referencing:

  • Prolonged sewer gas exposure in the family home

  • Ongoing respiratory distress, infections, and institutional abandonment

  • Threats of section 47s, removals, and child protection measures in place of support

  • Her refusal to accept the narrative of safeguarding, instead confirming active legal action

  • The toll of surveillance, false concern, and the use of bureaucratic power to erase responsibility

The message is part summary, part indictment — and entirely evidentiary.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Westminster had been repeatedly informed of medical and environmental danger and failed to intervene

  • That the home remained toxic and uninspected, while social workers threatened removals

  • That the parent was subjected to escalating distress while her children became ill

  • That the email functions not as a request for remedy — but as notice of claim

  • That systemic indifference crossed into psychological violence and environmental abuse

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when your family is coughing from toxic gas and all they offer is surveillance,
you’re not receiving safeguarding —
you’re surviving it.

Because when illness is ignored but parenting is questioned,
you’re not being protected. You’re being positioned.

And when you write to say “I’m suing you,”
you’ve already tried everything else.

This wasn’t a breakdown.
It was a record.
And now, it’s public.

IV. Violations

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Failure to ensure child welfare in a hazardous home environment

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 3 and 8
    Inhuman treatment via neglect, interference with private life under state surveillance

  • Public Sector Equality Duty
    Systemic disregard of medically disabled parent and her environment

  • Environmental Protection Act 1990
    Neglect of sewer gas exposure constituting health hazard

  • Equality Act 2010 – Section 20 and 27
    Failure to accommodate disability and retaliatory safeguarding actions

V. SWANK’s Position

You knew.
You didn’t act.
We got sick.
You threatened removal.
And now — we’re filing.

This wasn’t about concern.
It was about control.

This isn’t just a statement.
It’s your pre-litigation notice.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments: