Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): SWANK litigation archive

Showing posts with label SWANK litigation archive. Show all posts

Verbal Explanations Are Not My Medical Obligation

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 21 November 2024

“I’m Not Explaining Myself Verbally Ever Again”
Filed Under: Respiratory Sovereignty · Verbal Violence · Police Reports as Policy · NHS Misconduct · SWANK London Ltd

💬 Declared from the Lungs, Not the Lips

Dear Kirsty (and the institutional entourage):

“I will not explain things to anyone verbally anymore.”
That is not defiance. It is clinical instruction.
Because what you call a “conversation,” my airway registers as collapse.

📵 Verbal ≠ Safe

“I always get interrupted or the person doesn’t listen.”
That isn’t dialogue. It’s dismissal.

Verbal communication — when weaponised — becomes an arena for:

Ableist performance demands
Discrediting the disabled
Re-traumatisation in real-time

You demand I perform breathlessness for your legitimacy — then penalise me for gasping.

🏥 “It’s weird to bully me when I say my daughter can’t breathe.”

It’s not weird.
It’s structural.
It’s the NHS.

Because I documented her asthma —
And you documented me.

🚔 “From now on, I make police reports every time.”

Every refusal of care.
Every safeguarding ambush.
Every verbal stunt in fluorescent drag — logged, filed, numbered.

Because what you escalate, I indict.

You make me sick, then punish me for reacting to the sickness you inflicted.
That’s not care. That’s gaslit harm with a badge of office.

🫁 “My asthma is worse now — because of that ignorant doctor.”

And therefore:
I will not argue.
I will not explain.
I will record. I will timestamp. I will cite.
Every stolen breath becomes evidence.

📍 Filed While Breathing in Defiance
𝒫𝑜𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸, Strategic Non-Speaker, Documentarian of Respiratory Sabotage
✉ director@swanklondon.com | 🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Verbal Demands Declined.

The ER Staff Are Not Defenders of Life. They Are Defenders of Ego

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 22 November 2024

“King Couldn’t Breathe, and They Couldn’t Be Bothered.”
Filed Under: Emergency Neglect · Paediatric Respiratory Harm · Institutional Cruelty · NHS Defensive Culture · SWANK London Ltd

🩺 A Child in Distress. A System in Denial.

Dear Dr Reid,
“I took King to the emergency room this morning and they refused to see him at all…”
No clinical examination.
No diagnostic listening.
Not even a gesture toward medical duty.
King — my child — stood before them visibly unwell, barely able to speak, and was turned away like an inconvenience.
“King is very sick and can barely even talk.”
But in this institution, that does not qualify him for care.
Why?
Because we do not collapse politely.
We speak — and they resent that.

🎭 What NHS Defensiveness Looks Like in Practice

“They act so defensive as though I’m going to argue with them.”
Because argument, to them, is a mother who knows too much.
Because knowledge, for them, is a threat — not an asset.
This isn’t healthcare. It’s a gatekeeping ritual.
Conducted by staff more concerned with their own pride than a child’s oxygen saturation.
“They are hateful and leave us unable to breathe for months.”
That is not embellishment.
It is timeline.
Cumulative, compounding, recorded.
A hospital that treats concern as defiance, and a sick child as a disruption to its image.

👨‍⚕️ Referral Request – Clinical Urgency, Not Performance Management

“King definitely needs to be checked by Dr Reid…”
Because you don’t require submission to provide care.
Because you listen. Because you treat.
And because elsewhere, clinical judgment has been replaced by procedural vanity.
📍 Filed While Monitoring a Child the NHS Refused to See
𝒫𝑜𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸, Paediatric Advocate, Medical Gatekeeper, Archival Witness
✉ director@swanklondon.com | 🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathlessness Logged.

Verbal Disregard, Medical Denial, and the Echo Chamber of No Reply

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“Refusal Is Not a Misunderstanding. It’s a Strategy.”

Filed Under: Adjustment Refusal · A&E Negligence · Hospital Lies · Communication Shutdown · Asthma Mismanagement · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty & Colleagues in Selective Incompetence,

I wrote:

“Your hospitals refuse to treat us when we go to A&E due to ignorance about asthma.”

And I meant it.
They don’t fail to treat — they punish us for presenting.
Their protocol is disbelief. Their attitude is sanctioned negligence.

“You all refuse to provide adjustments when we are compromised verbally.”

This is not a misunderstanding.
It is a coordinated refusal. A tactic. A weapon.
What you call policy, we experience as entrapment.

“I can’t explain my perspective.”
“No one will give me the hospital’s perspective, and I’ve been asking for this for an entire year.”

A year of silence.
A year of being ghosted in writing while suffocated in person.
And what do I get in return?

Lies from St Thomas’.
Lies smoother than breath. Lies with laminated name tags.
Lies told in fonts of faux concern.

This isn’t miscommunication.
It is institutional contempt — cleverly disguised as clinical decorum.

You do not get to call it support when it’s silent, slow, and strategically cruel.

—

📍 Declined. Documented. Disbelieved.
Polly Chromatic
Diagnosed with Asthma, Not Amnesia
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Refusals Filed.

I Prefer Telepathy, But Email Will Suffice.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
I DON’T EMAIL FOR FUN. I EMAIL BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO READ.
Also Titled: “I Prefer Telepathy, But Email Will Suffice.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Ignored Emails · Lawyer Apathy · Accessibility Failure · Verbal Disability · Repetitive Dismissal · Institutional Ghosting · Folder Abuse · SWANK Telepathic Litigation Ledger

📣 IN CASE YOU “MISSED IT” AGAIN (AND AGAIN):

“I’ve been emailing you all asking for advice about the problem for a whole year and have received zero advice.”
“My lawyers told me to contact them for advice but put my emails in a separate folder so I can’t reach them.”
“Why would you just ignore my emails and assume they are meaningless?”
“My ability to talk is getting worse because no one will read my emails.”
“If you don’t understand the problem, you can’t help me.”

You didn’t lose the message.
You categorised it into oblivion.

🧠 ACCESS STATEMENT (WHICH YOU PREFER TO GHOST):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

This is a medical necessity.
Not a lifestyle choice. Not a whim.
And certainly not a reason to route me into “Folder: Do Not Open.”

📎 TRANSLATED FOR THE NON-TELEPATHIC:

Email is not excessive.
Silence is not defiance.
Non-verbal communication is not non-compliance.
And “no response” is not an ethical stance. It’s cowardice.

🛑 LITIGATION-READY CLOSURE:

I write because speech harms me.
I persist because you disappeared.
If you do not comprehend this by now, it's not due to complexity.
It’s due to contempt.

Polly Chromatic
Written. Archived. Ignored only by those who fear documentation.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com