⟡ SWANK Human Rights Complaint ⟡
“They Breached Domestic Law. We Filed Internationally.”
Filed: 1 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/UN/CRPD-VIOLATION/2025-06-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-01_SWANK_UNComplaint_DisabilityRetaliation_HumanRights_Violations_SpecialRapporteur.pdf
I. When the System Becomes the Harm, You Leave the System
On 1 June 2025, SWANK London Ltd. filed a formal human rights complaint with the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner, addressed to the following Special Rapporteurs:
On the rights of persons with disabilities
On violence against women and girls
On the right to health
On the sale and exploitation of children
On the independence of judges and lawyers
We did not submit it as a plea.
We submitted it as evidence.
This is not domestic protest.
This is international indictment.
II. What the Complaint Records
This submission documents the United Kingdom’s failure to protect a disabled mother and her children from:
Retaliatory safeguarding threats
Institutional gaslighting by social work and medical authorities
Discrimination in access to healthcare, education, and housing
Legal process weaponised to conceal harm
Obstruction of complaint pathways at every stage
It is not a story.
It is a structured record of violations, across sectors, statutes, and jurisdictions.
If domestic regulators will not enforce their own standards,
We submit them to someone who might.
III. Why the United Nations Was Chosen
Because this archive was not built for headlines.
It was built for receipts, referral, and historical witness.
Because the following rights were violated:
Articles 5, 6, 16, 21, and 25 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
The principle of best interests under the Convention on the Rights of the Child
The protection from reprisal codified in international whistleblower law
And because retaliation against the disabled is not a service failure.
It is a violation of international law.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not “reach out.”
We submit.
We file.
We notify.
This complaint is not the end of a process.
It is the beginning of jurisdictional memory.
If the UK does not answer to its own laws,
It may yet answer to its treaties.
Let the record show:
The abuse was not personal.
The complaint is not emotional.
The filing is now international.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.