Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): parental defence

Showing posts with label parental defence. Show all posts

When Innocence is Reprimanded by Ignorance.

🖋️ SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
UNWARRANTED WARNINGS: DO NOT INSTRUCT MY CHILD TO SMOKE

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Advocacy · Institutional Assumptions · Cultural Misprofiling · Parental Sovereignty · SWANK Parental Defense

The Message

On 14 December 2024, Polly Chromatic wrote to Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman, with Laura Savage copied and Nannette Nicholson Bcc’d:

“I don’t appreciate Regal’s doctor at Hammersmith Hospital telling Regal not to smoke or use vapes when this wasn’t even in his consciousness prior to her telling him that.”
“There’s no need to reprimand my kids for things they have never thought about.”
“My kids are not like British children. My children don’t have any consciousness of the disgusting things humans do and I don’t want them exposed to it or treated like they would do such ignorant things.”
“My children don’t need to be treated like trash to behave like British children.”

This is not just a complaint. It is a declaration of parental sovereignty.
To instruct a child not to smoke when they’ve never considered smoking is not guidance—it is verbal contamination.

Disability Statement

Please Note: I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.

📍 Documented by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Projections Rejected.

Twelve Legal Questions. Zero Legal Answers.

⚖️ SWANK Dispatch: When a Lawyer Has to Ask Why Your Children Were Touched

🗓️ 25 August 2020

Filed Under: legal intervention, forced medical exams, investigation without cause, rights breach, family life violation, child protection misconduct, lack of disclosure, systemic harassment, trauma documentation

“Was there a report of abuse? If so, where is it?
If not — then what gave you the right to examine my sons’ genitals?”
— A Mother, Represented and Still Waiting for Answers

This letter from attorney Lara Maroof of James Law Chambers to Ashley Adams, Deputy Director of Social Development, formalises the case that Polly Chromatic has been trying to make for over three years:
That no lawful cause has been given for the intrusion, medical violations, and trauma inflicted upon her and her children.

🧾 I. What This Letter Demands

Twelve direct legal questions, including:

Was any report of suspected abuse ever made in 2017 or 2019?
Was any assessment carried out before police and social worker visits?
On what grounds were her three sons subjected to genital examinations?
Why was no interview conducted with Polly prior to these exams?
Why were the children not spoken to before being touched?
What legal section was used to justify action — or inaction — under the Children (Care and Protection) Ordinance?
What lawful grounds existed for the 26 March 2020 home intrusion during national lockdown?
Is there an active investigation or not?

These are basic statutory questions.
Yet none had ever been answered.
Even after three years.
Even after a lawyer asked in writing.

⚠️ II. What This Reveals

There is no record of a proper cause for any investigation
The department violated both medical ethics and legal procedure
No closure was given. No actions were explained.
The result has been chronic, legally sanctioned distress for Noelle and her children

“After three years, it is reasonable to expect your Department would have been able to form a very clear opinion…”
Instead — they formed no opinion, no case, and no lawful conclusion.

📌 Final Note:

The letter is from a lawyer.
The trauma is from a government.
The burden is on a mother.
And the silence, still —
is from the State.