“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Disability Coercion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disability Coercion. Show all posts

This Is the Day the Social Worker Became the Suspect.


⟡ “I Told the Police She Was Abusing Her Power. I Filed It As a Crime.” ⟡
A written submission to the Metropolitan Police naming Westminster safeguarding officer Kirsty Hornal as the agent of coercion, disability harassment, and safeguarding misuse. This wasn’t a misunderstanding. It was a pattern. And now, it’s on record.

Filed: 15 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/MPS/KH-CRIM-02
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-15_SWANK_PoliceReport_KirstyHornal_ProceduralMisconduct_DisabilityAbuse_CriminalFiling.pdf
Formal complaint submitted to the Metropolitan Police (Ref: BCA-10622-25-0101-IR), alleging misconduct by Kirsty Hornal of Westminster City Council. Accusations include disability discrimination, coercion under the guise of safeguarding, and psychological harm. Medical diagnoses disclosed. Pattern documented. Crime reported.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic filed a police report.
Not a complaint. Not a concern.
A formal, timestamped, criminal allegation — with:

  • A named suspect: Kirsty Hornal

  • A pattern of coercive conduct mislabelled as “support”

  • Verbal pressure applied despite diagnosed muscle dysphonia and eosinophilic asthma

  • A timeline of escalating harm, home intrusion, and procedural deception

  • A legal explanation of how “voluntary” safeguarding was used as leverage against a disabled person

This wasn’t metaphorical harm. It was physical, medical, and documented under criminal reference.

II. What the Report Establishes

  • That the state’s behaviour was not therapeutic — it was coercive

  • That verbal contact was used against a known disability

  • That emotional distress was a product of deliberate procedural strategy

  • That Westminster staff knew about the medical conditions — and leveraged them

  • That the parent was forced to report her own support service as a source of harm

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because disability is not a flaw to be managed — it’s a legal status that demands protection.
Because safeguarding is not above the law.
And because this was the moment the State went from negligent to accused.

SWANK archived this because:

  • It is a written, police-confirmed turning point

  • It proves that the harm was not just witnessed — it was reported

  • It memorialises the fact that the safeguarding officer became the suspect

  • It begins the record not of concern — but of criminal culpability

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 –
    • Section 20: Reasonable adjustment denied
    • Section 26: Harassment via repeated verbal pressure
    • Section 27: Retaliation post-complaint
    • Section 149: Duty to prevent discrimination not met

  • Protection from Harassment Act 1997 –
    • Coercive pattern of communication after boundaries were legally set

  • Human Rights Act 1998 –
    • Article 3: Inhuman treatment via sustained psychological coercion
    • Article 8: Violation of family life and privacy
    • Article 14: Discrimination by procedural pathway

  • Children Act 1989 –
    • Institutional disruption to home life under false pretext

  • Social Work England Misconduct Framework –
    • Failure to respect disability, legal boundaries, and safe practice

V. SWANK’s Position

When a safeguarding officer causes the harm she was sent to prevent — and uses disability to do it — she stops being a professional. She becomes a perpetrator. And when the parent files a police report and the state keeps sending her anyway, the issue isn’t care. It’s institutional complicity.

SWANK London Ltd. recognises this document as a criminal declaration of procedural abuse — filed to the police, named by statute, archived in full.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Documented Obsessions