“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label constitutional violation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constitutional violation. Show all posts

The Care Plan That Never Was



⟡ SWANK Legal Dispatch II ⟡

A Second Engraving of Institutional Delusion
September 2020

Three Years of Silence and One Letter of Nonsense


I. A Legal Response to a Fabricated Reality

After three years of intrusion without justification, the Department of Social Development (DSD) issued a letter on 11 September 2020, accusing Polly Chromatic of “non-compliance.”

The reply—penned with steel and clarity by Mark A. Fulford of F Chambers—articulated what any legitimate authority should already understand:

"The only point of ‘non-compliance’ would be the alleged Care Plan of August 2019, which, prior to your letter, our client had never seen or heard of."

In other words: You cannot violate a phantom.


II. Absence of Engagement = Institutional Failure

DSD's three-year silence is laid bare as both procedural negligence and a breach of natural justice.

  • Polly’s correspondence: voluminous, specific, and archived.

  • DSD’s replies: two in total, only after legal pressure.

  • Complaints: never disclosed.

  • Allegations: never served.

  • Medical reports: withheld entirely.

“Our client has not seen even one complaint, one report, or one shred of documentation.”

A department operating like a rumour mill, not a public authority.


III. Legal Standards Quoted, Institutional Conduct Condemned

“It is trite law that any person, before having their fundamental rights and freedoms infringed, deserves to know the complaint against them.”

The letter is restrained—but humiliating.
It reminds DSD that transparency is not a luxury. It is the law.


IV. A Reasonable Request—Still Unmet

The solicitors at F Chambers requested, plainly and properly:

  • All documentation relating to the case

  • All medical records taken during the children’s forced examinations

  • The mythical August 2019 Care Plan

Only then, the letter stated, could Polly even consider a meeting with a child protection officer.

No reply. No plan. Just bureaucratic mist.


V. Closing Remarks, Laced with Poise

“This does require that all parties and stakeholders act with full transparency, fairness, and reasonableness…”

In SWANK translation:
Produce the paperwork—or stand down.




© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
This letter was the velvet glove—do not mistake it for weakness.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy



Documented Obsessions