“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label legal inaction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legal inaction. Show all posts

Kind Words. No Action. Real Harm.


⟡ “She Was Nice — and She Did Nothing.” ⟡
The kindest neglect is still neglect. Especially when it comes in email form.

Filed: 4 April 2025
Reference: SWANK/SWE/COMPLAINT-07
📎 Download PDF – 2025-04-04_SWANK_SWEComplaint_KirstyHornal_DisabilityInaction_EmotionalHarm.pdf
This is the formal complaint to Social Work England about Kirsty Hornal — not for aggression, but for empathy without action. Polly Chromatic’s health was collapsing, her rights were known, and her accessibility needs were repeatedly affirmed — but never enforced. The result: procedural decay disguised as gentle concern.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic disclosed her legal and medical status.
She asked for written-only contact.
She explained that unannounced visits caused trauma, panic, and medical deterioration.
Kirsty Hornal agreed — and did nothing.

She said she would contact Dr. Philip Reid.
She didn’t.
She acknowledged the sewer gas exposure and respiratory crisis.
She let others keep coming.

Nice emails. Zero protection.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Kirsty acknowledged Eosinophilic Asthma, Muscle Tension Dysphonia, and written-only adjustments

  • That despite awareness, she allowed verbal pressure, visits, and distress to continue

  • That medical evidence, safety risks, and retraumatisation were dismissed by inaction

  • That no attempt was made to support Polly’s legal rights or safeguard her and her disabled children

  • That passivity replaced protection, even as the crisis escalated

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because being "sympathetic" while people suffer isn't professional — it’s negligent.
Because it’s easier to ignore a fire when you’re holding a teacup.
Because good intentions don’t count when harm is systemic and preventable.
And because Polly Chromatic isn’t collecting compliments — she’s collecting evidence.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Standard 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6 – Failure to uphold social justice, inclusion, and protection of rights

  • Standard 2.1, 2.4, 2.5 – Inadequate follow-through despite acknowledged trust

  • Standard 3.1, 3.3, 3.9, 3.13 – Lack of action in a known medical and safeguarding risk context

  • Standard 5.1, 5.5 – Continued emotional harm through unchecked and discriminatory practice

  • Standard 6.3 – Failure to support the complaint process or escalate concerns

V. SWANK’s Position

Polly Chromatic didn’t ask for empathy.
She asked for intervention.
Kirsty gave the first and avoided the second.

This wasn’t malice — but it wasn’t neutral either.
It was harm, dressed nicely.
And now it’s dressed in PDF.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

We Obeyed Everything. They Protected Nothing.


⟡ To the Attorney General: A Letter of Exhausted Obedience ⟡

Filed: 15 July 2020
Reference: SWANK/TCI/2020-LTR-AG
📎 Download PDF — 2020-07-15_SWANK_TCI_Letter_AG_SocialDevComplaint_AAdamsF_MGarland_LegalBreach.pdf

I. 3.5 Years of Obedience. Zero Years of Protection.

This is the formal complaint submitted to the Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands after three and a half years of unlawful surveillance, unsolicited home visits, and jurisdictional harassment conducted under the banner of “child welfare.”

The social workers had no statutory grounds.
The complainant had done nothing unlawful.
And yet the oversight never arrived.

This is not a cry for help. It is a declaration of exhaustion by compliance — where every deadline was met, every form submitted, and every demand answered.

And still, the harassment continued.

II. The Allegations (Which the State Refused to Answer)

This letter details:

  • The refusal of Social Development officers to acknowledge eosinophilic asthma and shielding status

  • Repeated attempts to gain access to a medically vulnerable household

  • The unlawful collection of documents, IDs, and health details under threat

  • The systemic disregard of the Education Ordinance, which the parent complied with in full

What should have been a closed file became a test of endurance:
How long could one family obey before someone would protect them?

III. Named, Filed, and Remembered

The document includes reference to:

  • Ashley Adams-Forbes, Deputy Director of Social Development

  • Mark Garland, Director of Education

  • Unnamed truancy officers, whose visits were intrusive, unnecessary, and medically reckless

Each name is preserved not for vengeance, but for record integrity.
We do not redact the people who refused to act — even when warned.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not consider silence a lawful response.
We do not consider “reviewing your complaint” a substitute for action.
We do not confuse colonial politeness with compliance with law.

This letter is not rhetorical. It is procedural.

It is addressed to the Attorney General — because every other official had already failed.

Let the record show:

  • The timeline was sent

  • The medical harm was detailed

  • The education laws were quoted

  • The silence was documented, dated, and filed




No comments:

Documented Obsessions