⟡ SWANK ICPC Farce Dispatch ⟡
28 February 2024
If There’s a Concern, Why Won’t You Name It?
Labels: ICPC procedural failure, child protection theatre, RBKC communication breach, safeguarding without allegation, SWANK evidence file
—
I. The Setup: A Confidential Letter with No Substance
At 10:05am, Rhiannon Hodgson (RBKC Case Conference Coordinator) emails Noelle Bonneannée an invitation to an Initial Child Protection Conference regarding:
Honor Bonneannée
King Bonneannée
Prince Bonneannée
Romeo Bonneannée
Scheduled for Monday 4 March at 10:30am, to be held at Malton Road Hub, W10 5UP.
Accompanied by:
A generic “Parent’s CPC Form”
No information on the alleged concern
A phone number for Samira Issa (already known to ignore written boundaries)
—
II. Noelle’s Response: Refusal, Reworded as Grace
At 10:59am, Noelle responds:
“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children.”
“It would be nice if someone could inform me.”
A masterclass in understatement.
This email says, You are holding a meeting about my children’s welfare and you haven’t said a word about what the concern is. Why?
—
III. The SWANK Conclusion: A Meeting Held to Justify Itself
When institutions convene a “child protection” meeting without cause, clarity, or documentation:
It’s not protection
It’s not procedure
It’s not concern
It’s pretext.
—
Filed under:
ICPC without evidence, safeguarding show trial, failure to disclose allegations, RBKC parental disrespect, SWANK procedural audit
© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. If no one will say what the danger is, it’s because the danger is being invented.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.