“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

£23 Million: The Price of Ignoring Medical Evidence and Inviting Retaliation


⟡ The Hospitals That Called Social Services When I Asked to Breathe ⟡

Filed: 1 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/GMC/DUAL-SUBMISSION-NEGLIGENCE
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-01_SWANK_GMC_Complaint_StThomas_Chelsea_DisabilityNeglect_SafeguardingAbuse_£23MClaim.pdf

I. £23 Million: The Price of Ignoring Medical Evidence and Inviting Retaliation

This dual complaint, filed with the General Medical Council, names:

  • Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust

  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

The charges:

  • Clinical negligence during documented respiratory crisis

  • Dismissal of protected disability adjustments

  • Use of “safeguarding” as reputational defence

  • Retaliatory contact disguised as care coordination

What they couldn’t treat, they investigated.
What they ignored, they weaponised.
What they feared — was documentation.

II. When Hospitals Operate Like Surveillance Branches

The evidence shows:

  • Medical notes vanished from timelines

  • Allergy labels overridden with procedural shrugs

  • Formal complaints followed by multi-agency escalation

  • Disability treated not as protected, but inconvenient

This wasn’t poor communication.
It was bureaucratic violence under clinical letterhead.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because medical malpractice is not neutral when it follows complaint.
Because no hospital has the right to summon safeguarding for a diagnosis it refused to read.
Because when patient harm is followed by agency collusion, the bill is measured in millions — and exhibits.

Let the record show:

  • The doctors knew the condition

  • The trust ignored the adjustment

  • The patient collapsed

  • And SWANK — filed the damages, formatted by respiratory episode

This isn’t a case file.
It’s a legal artefact of NHS-enabled sabotage.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit the NHS to use “concern” as a shield against liability.
We do not allow hospitals to threaten disabled mothers into submission.
We do not believe safeguarding is lawful when it follows whistleblowing.

Let the record show:

The care was delayed.
The asthma worsened.
The mother reported.
And SWANK — filed £23 million in civil response.

This is not anecdotal.
It’s court-sealed, regulator-notified, and irrevocably archived.




No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.

Documented Obsessions