Chromatic v NHS, LA & CPS: On the Misreading of Oxygen, and the Collapse of Just Cause

---

❖ SWANK Addendum ❖

St Thomas Hospital, CPS Fabrication, and the Unoxygenated Collapse of Logic

A very tragic misreading, followed by a very public retaliation.

---

Filed date: 12 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-A08-STTHOMAS
PDF Filename: 2025-07-12_Addendum_StThomas_CPSRetaliation.pdf
Summary: The Local Authority removed four children based on a medically disproven allegation. This document explains why that was not only unlawful, but intellectually offensive.

---

I. What Happened

On 2 January 2024, Polly Chromatic attended A&E at St Thomas Hospital, severely unwell and visibly collapsing. Her chronic condition — eosinophilic asthma — had been exacerbated by prolonged sewer gas exposure in a neglected rental flat. She was short of breath, dizzy, and barely upright. Her daughter Honor was with her. Instead of medical attention, she received harassment, followed by a safeguarding report.

When Polly — unable to breathe — dared to ask for treatment before answering questions about her parenting, she was later met at her hotel by police. She was accused of racial abuse. There was no CCTV. No arrest. No medical treatment.And crucially, no intoxication.

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This event was the genesis of the entire safeguarding chain — an A&E visit where low oxygen was mistaken for high aggression.

St Thomas Hospital had already recorded oxygen saturation of 44% just two months earlier, on 2 November 2023 — a value clinically understood as life-threatening hypoxia. Yet they told Westminster Children’s Services she was "intoxicated."

There was:

• No tox screen

• No diagnosis

• No justification

• And no shame

---

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is what happens when you treat a disabled mother like a suspect instead of a patient.
Because they took her children on the back of this fabrication.
Because the entire safeguarding narrative — from the CPS to the EPO — was built on a medically impossible lie.

---

IV. Violations

• Article 3, ECHR: Inhuman and degrading treatment of a disabled woman

• Article 8, ECHR: Destruction of family life on false grounds

• Children Act 1989: Failure to protect four vulnerable children from environmental harm

• Equality Act 2010: Disability discrimination, medical ignorance, and racial profiling

• NHS Duty of Care: Blatant abandonment of respiratory crisis

---

V. SWANK’s Position

This incident is not anecdotal — it is archival.
It demonstrates how negligence, racialised assumptions, and institutional gaslighting create procedural myths that become judicial weapons.
This isn’t a case of misunderstanding. It is a bureaucratic artefact of cruelty, documented precisely, and now admissible in every venue that matters.

---

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.