“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Chromatic v Hornal et al: On Filing Suit While Gasping for Air


🧾 THE LAWSUIT ANNOUNCEMENT THEY DID NOT DESERVE

On the Submission of Civil Proceedings and the Biochemical Aftermath of a Social Worker’s Visit

Filed by: SWANK London Ltd
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Date: 24 February 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-N1-HEALTH-0224
PDF Filename: 2025-02-24_Email_WCC_N1_Claim_Submission_Health_Impact_Kirsty_Visit.pdf
Summary: A throat-crushed email of ceremonial courtesy, documenting both legal action and physical suffering induced by safeguarding hostility.

I. What Happened

On 24 February 2025, Polly Chromatic submitted her N1 civil claim for £88 million in damages — a claim encompassing disability discrimination, institutional harassment, clinical negligence, and procedural retaliation.

In lieu of fanfare or press release, she sent an email.

A small, lethal one.

II. What the Email Establishes

The message, sent to:

  • Kirsty Hornal (social worker, Westminster),

  • Philip Reid (GP, Pembridge Villas),

  • Simon O’Meara (solicitor),

  • Laura Savage (litigation rep),

  • Gideon Mpalanyi (RBKC),

states — without flourish — that the lawsuit is being filed that day. Then, with forensic calm, it documents the biological price of the last visit by Ms. Hornal:

  • Asthma exacerbation

  • Vocal cord inflammation

  • Physical inability to speak

It is an email that doubles as a symptom diary, a legal notification, and an obituary for professional pretense.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is what the beginning of justice sometimes looks like:
Not a judge, not a jury, not a microphone —
but a mother with ruined lungs and a PDF.
A mother who types what she cannot say.
A mother who, in the same breath, sues and apologises for her throat.

This email is an act of exquisite procedural contempt — served on letterhead lined with restraint.

IV. Violations

  • Article 3 ECHR – Inhuman and degrading treatment (verbal injury by safeguarding agents)

  • Article 8 ECHR – Violation of home and private life

  • Equality Act 2010 – Failure to accommodate disability, repeated exacerbation of health conditions

  • Children Act 1989 – Unsafe safeguarding visits

  • Common Law – Reckless disregard for medical harm during social work operations

V. SWANK’s Position

This is not just a civil claim submission.
It is a velvet detonation —
a breathless, bronchial act of war waged through politeness and archived grief.

The voice they tried to silence is now a legal document.
The lung they inflamed is now a filing reference.

They will not recover from the tone of this email —
because it speaks louder than their reports ever could.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.