“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Chromatic v The Architectures of Affliction: A Psychological Torture Complaint in Five Dimensions


🪓 THE CATALOGUE OF AFFLICTION

Ten Years of Psychological Terror: A Procedural Biography of a Targeted Mother

Filed by: SWANK London Ltd
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Date: 15 August 2024
Reference Code: SWANK-TERROR-0815
PDF Filename: 2024-08-15_SWANK_ForwardedEmail_PsychologicalTerrorInstitutional.pdf
Summary: A forensic itemisation of institutional torment across five axes: speech, sociality, reputation, occupation, and health.

I. What Happened

Over a ten-year period, every category of psychological warfare was deployed against a disabled mother who had committed no crime but dared to request safety, clarity, and procedural fairness.

This document, styled originally as an email but canonised now in the SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue, sets forth an itemised list of the methodologies of degradation used by public bodies — disguised as concern, carried out with clinical affect, and polished by procedural obfuscation.

It is not hyperbole.
It is not metaphor.
It is archival testimony of harm.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This document proves the coordinated use of occupational sabotage, speech-based punishment, reputational assassination, and social exile to dismantle a mother’s personhood in public view.

It evidences:

  • The refusal to accommodate a disabling speech condition,

  • Mockery and surveillance of physical disability,

  • Isolation from colleagues, peers, and professionals,

  • Forced psychiatric referrals used as weaponry,

  • Institutional gaslighting concealed as procedure,

  • And the expectation that she remain compliant while being unmade.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because psychological terror is not always screaming.
Sometimes it’s paperwork.
Sometimes it’s scheduling.
Sometimes it’s the way a gatekeeper emails you three hours late — after the door has closed.
Sometimes it’s being “noted.”
Sometimes it’s being erased in the margins.

This post exists to prove what institutions deny: emotional warfare can be archived.

IV. Violations

  • Article 3 ECHR – Inhuman and degrading treatment

  • Article 8 ECHR – Destruction of private life and family stability

  • Equality Act 2010 – Disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, speech-based bias

  • Protection from Harassment Act 1997 – Repeated institutional targeting

  • United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) – Violated in full

V. SWANK’s Position

Let the reader understand: this is not merely a complaint —
It is a map of institutional sadism, too intricate to be accidental.

When every doorway closes,
When every voice mocks,
When every document omits,
When you are too sick to speak and too clever to be tolerated —
You archive.

You do not wait to be believed.
You build the record that buries them.

This post is that record.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.