“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Chromatic v The Education Department That Never Wrote Down Its Own Policy – On the Tragedy of Being More Prepared Than the State


🎓 “Please Provide Me the Law, Since You Seem to Have Misplaced It.”

⟡ A Formal Letter to the Department of Education After Years of Harassment Over Lawful Homeschooling

IN THE MATTER OF: The Right to Educate, the Abuse of Authority, and the Extraordinary Harm Caused by Not Reading the Policy Before Making a Threat

⟡ METADATA

Filed: 5 August 2020
Reference Code: SWANK-TCI-EDUCATION-HOMESCHOOLING-DENIAL
Court File Name: 2020-08-05_Court_Letter_TCI_EducationDept_HomeschoolingDenial_AbuseSummary
Summary: This letter, sent to Edgar Howell (Director of Education, Turks and Caicos), is a formal, cutting response to three years of escalating threats, false truancy accusations, and unlawful safeguarding actions — despite full compliance with a legal homeschool arrangement approved since 2017. The letter recounts sexual abuse by hospital staff, illegal property entries, fabricated vaccination concerns, and the failure of multiple departments to read the actual legislation. It ends, with composed sarcasm, by asking for the very policy they claim was never followed — even though it was never provided.

I. What Happened

In June 2017, Polly Chromatic (then known as Noelle Bonneannée) met in person with Deputy Director Mark Garland and submitted her curriculum, degrees, and intent to homeschool. This was done with the full understanding that Garland was the correct authority. She continued submitting documentation yearly.

Despite this, she was:

  • Accused of truancy in public by a truancy officer yelling at her in a grocery store

  • Repeatedly visited by social workers without reports or legal reason

  • Forced to submit her children to invasive hospital “examinations” — including genital inspection

  • Subjected to warrantless entry, even during COVID lockdown, in violation of emergency laws

  • Blamed for not speaking to “the right person” despite having never been told who that was

  • Threatened again in 2020, three years after full compliance, with having her children taken

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That no policy was ever provided, even after direct request

  • That the Department of Education and Department of Social Development coordinated unlawful threats

  • That social workers fabricated medical concerns (non-vaccination) and used them as pretext for repeated trauma

  • That the Complaints Commission acted not as a mediator, but a fresh source of coercion

  • That officials repeatedly shifted blame rather than acknowledge a departmental failure to document or communicate correctly

  • That the family’s trauma is not incidental — it is the direct result of bureaucratic laziness and safeguarding theatre

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this letter proves that even in the face of institutional incompetence, the mother followed every rule. Because asking for “the policy” after three years of harassment is not a formality — it’s a slap in the face. Because “talked to the wrong person” is not a legal defence. Because no one should have to endure forced sexualised exams of their children while the department argues over who was CC’d. Because safeguarding without records is not oversight — it’s an excuse to trespass.

IV. Violations

  • Failure to provide written homeschool policy or legal process

  • Accusation of truancy despite full compliance

  • Sexual assault of minors in clinical setting without lawful grounds

  • Warrantless entry during a national pandemic

  • Threats of removal based on bureaucratic blame-shifting

  • Retaliatory conduct under the guise of safeguarding

  • Procedural negligence at the Department of Education, Social Development, and the Complaints Commission

V. SWANK’s Position

We log this document as a formal indictment of every public official who forgot how laws work. SWANK London Ltd. affirms:

  • That providing documentation in 2017 should not result in threats in 2020

  • That truancy cannot be claimed when no policy was ever disclosed

  • That trauma inflicted during “examinations” cannot be undone with apologies

  • That when a mother is asked to be both the educator and the administrator, the state has failed

  • And that the most dangerous thing about safeguarding misuse is not the action — it’s the delusion of authority without law

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.