⟡ SWANK Refusal Proxy Policy ⟡
Filed: 9 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/POL/PROXY-01
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Issued by: Polly Chromatic, Director, SWANK London Ltd.
π‘ Policy Purpose
This document affirms the right of SWANK London Ltd. to act as a written proxy for individuals who are:
Medically exempt from verbal contact
Under safeguarding or institutional surveillance
Experiencing retaliation, procedural harassment, or silencing
Simply unwilling to directly interface with abusive systems
Where public bodies demand phone calls, home visits, or coerced cooperation, we intervene in writing — with formatting sharp enough to draw blood.
✉ What SWANK May Do
When acting as Refusal Proxy, SWANK London Ltd. may:
Issue formal refusals or complaint responses on behalf of individuals
Demand written-only correspondence in line with disability law
Accept institutional contact in proxy capacity
Preserve and publish such correspondence for evidentiary protection
Escalate refusals to directors, regulators, or legal authorities
Refusals issued by SWANK are not emotional protestations. They are jurisdictional closures — structurally sound and archivally preserved.
⚖ Legal Basis
This policy is grounded in:
Equality Act 2010 – protections for disabled individuals, including communication adjustments and safeguarding from harassment
Human Rights Act 1998 – Articles 6, 8, 10, and 14 (right to private life, communication, and expression)
Companies Act 2006 – confirming the legal personality and agency of incorporated entities
Common Law – right to third-party representation, especially under duress or disability
Safeguarding Frameworks – which prohibit coercive or retaliatory contact
No institution may lawfully demand verbal contact when a disability-related proxy policy is in place.
π« What SWANK Will Not Do
To be clear, SWANK is not a solicitor, and this policy is not an invitation to impersonate or substitute legal authority. SWANK will never:
Offer legal advice
Act in court on your behalf
Mediate disputes privately
Misrepresent identity or authorship
We document. We shield. We refuse — publicly, lawfully, and with unimpeachable contempt.
πͺ If You Object
If your institution believes that written-only proxy responses are “uncooperative,” we suggest you:
Reread the Equality Act 2010
Consult your own internal safeguarding ethics
Reflect on why a formatting company now protects more rights than your department
π To Engage SWANK as Proxy
You do not need to explain your trauma to us.
You do not need to prove you deserve dignity.
You need only to write to:
✉ director@swanklondon.com
Subject: “Refusal Proxy Request”
And tell us:
What you’re refusing
Who is harassing you
Whether you need public or anonymous documentation
We will respond within 3–5 working days.
If accepted, your refusal becomes structured resistance.
⟡ Final Note
Some people scream.
Some people vanish.
We write.
If you cannot say “no” out loud —
We will file it in Helvetica.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd.
All Refusals Must Be Typed™
A courtroom designed by Alexander McQueen.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.