“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

In Re: Regal’s Journal and the Statutory Fiction of Safe Foster Care


🪞 SWANK London Ltd.
The Report They Never Wanted Filed
The Regal Entry: In Re Criminal Neglect Disguised as Foster Care

Filed: 2 August 2025
Reference Code: SWANK-CRIMELOG-0825-DEL
Filename: 2025-08-02_SWANK_CrimeLog_FosterNeglect_DelPoliceReport.pdf
1-Line Summary:
A formal police report documenting food deprivation, asthma risk, and racialised treatment of a 10-year-old U.S. citizen in state care.

I. WHAT HAPPENED

On 2 August 2025, a police report was filed by Polly Chromatic on behalf of her 10-year-old son, Kingdom, documenting criminal neglect and discriminatory abuse in a Westminster-commissioned foster placement.

According to a handwritten journal entry authored by Regal and recovered during supervised contact, his brother was explicitly told "you can’t eat because you’re 10." The journal further describes a regime of arbitrary restrictions:
– No water bottles upstairs
– No pencils upstairs
– Mocking comments tied to his American identity

Kingdom suffers from eosinophilic asthma, a chronic and medically serious condition. These restrictions jeopardised his health, emotional wellbeing, and autonomy. His mother reported this treatment as criminal neglect, compounded by disability discrimination and xenophobic verbal abuse.

The report was submitted under police reference TAA-38016-25-0101-IR.

II. WHAT THE POLICE REPORT ESTABLISHES

This is not a hypothetical. It is not an allegation dressed in fury.
It is a filed, timestamped, and jurisdictionally sound police report alleging:

  • Medical negligence through hydration denial

  • Psychological abuse via infantilising rules

  • Racial and national discrimination toward a Black American boy

  • Safeguarding failure in a local authority-commissioned foster home

  • Documented emotional harm recovered in the child's own handwriting

Regal was not acting out — he was documenting. And now, so are we.

III. WHY SWANK LOGGED IT

Because no foster carer should tell a child when they can eat based on their age.
Because asthma is not a disciplinary tool.
Because cruelty delivered in a soft voice is still cruelty.
Because the child wrote it down — and the mother filed it — and we archive it.

This isn’t just parenting interference. It is criminal interference in a child’s health, development, and liberty.

IV. VIOLATIONS

  • Children Act 1989 – Sections 1(3)(b), 17, and 47: Welfare neglect and child protection failure

  • Children and Families Act 2014, s.19 – Violation of wellbeing duty

  • UNCRC Articles 3, 12, 13, 19 – Best interests, right to be heard, expression, and protection from harm

  • ECHR Article 8 – Violation of private and family life

  • Equality Act 2010, s.6 and s.20 – Discrimination on grounds of disability

  • Criminal Law – Emotional abuse, neglect, and racial hostility

V. SWANK’S POSITION

This report has now been entered into the SWANK CrimeLog.

We do not merely document harm — we criminalise it, we narrate it, and we dare it to survive scrutiny.

Westminster placed this child.
A foster carer enforced deprivation.
The state concealed it — and a mother reported it.
Now we preserve it.

This is not safeguarding.
This is a cover-up wearing lanyards.

Filed with institutional disgust and permanent archival scorn,
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
www.swanklondon.com

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.