Restoration Is Not Forgiveness
Or, Why I’m Still Coming for You After You Give Them Back
Filed under: Post-Reunification Vengeance, Institutional Memory, The Elegant Long Game
Court Labels: Civil Restoration, Bureaucratic Consequences, Unrepented Misuse
Search Description: Polly Chromatic confirms: getting her children back is not the end — it’s the beginning.
Let me be exquisitely clear.
When they return my children — and they will return my children —
that is not the end.
That is Day One.
I do not consider restoration an adequate remedy. I consider it a procedural reversal of theft.
And I do not forgive thieves simply because they panic and return what they stole.
You do not get to drag me through the trenches of safeguarding perjury,
accuse me of mental illness while I outthink you daily,
sabotage my health, disrupt my children’s education, and then—
Oops! All is forgiven?
Because you finally noticed you were losing?
No.
Once they are home, safe, sleeping in their own beds,
then I begin my long, methodical demolition of every system, department, and agent
that conspired to injure us.
This is not vengeance. This is administrative hygiene.
I am cleaning up the mess you made — by making sure none of you are allowed to make it again.
I will file what others forget.
I will write what you tried to redact.
I will publish what makes your departments scramble at 3am.
You do not get to abuse, then retreat.
You get to be named.
You get to be catalogued.
You get to be undone.
Your compliance does not cancel your crimes.
And your return does not erase the records.
I’m not done. I’m just getting started.
📌 Filed by: Polly Chromatic
📍 Location: Flat 37, Fortress of Strategic Contempt
📂 Archive: www.swanklondon.com
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.