🚧 The Fence Was Not the Problem — Your Job Performance Was
⟡ A Formal Complaint Regarding False Reports, Pandemic Recklessness, and the Spectacular Failure to Discern a Well-Run Home from Gossip
IN THE MATTER OF: Investigations That Won’t End, Reports That Shouldn’t Have Begun, and the Invisible Line Between Safeguarding and Harassment
⟡ METADATA
Filed: 13 July 2020
Reference Code: SWANK-TCI-FALSE-REPORTS-COVID-RISK
Court File Name: 2020-07-13_Records_AshleyAdamsComplaintFalseReportsAndCOVIDRisk
Summary: A formal, incisive, and morally immaculate letter to the Department of Social Development, requesting that someone finally do their job with logic, medical literacy, and a basic sense of proportion. Written during the COVID-19 pandemic, this document calls out: false allegations, pandemic violations, sexist communication routes, neighbour-instigated state harm, and the exhausting absurdity of being punished for homeschooling brilliantly.
I. What Happened
After a year-long "investigation" sparked by a tantrum-prone fence-builder and a hostile Airbnb host named Jenny, Polly Chromatic (then using her legal name) was still being monitored without plan, outcome, or lawful process. Despite having no safeguarding concerns of merit, officials continued to drop in, interrupt homeschooling, and — in one outrageous instance — trespassed on her property during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite her medical condition and clear objection. This letter lays it all out: calmly, precisely, and without one wasted word.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That the initiating reports were fabricated and retaliatory, based on petty neighbour feuds
That the children were (and are) fully vaccinated, lawfully educated, and thriving
That the department failed to issue any written outcome or plan over a full year of “investigation”
That gendered disrespect occurred, with professionals avoiding direct dialogue with the mother in favour of speaking to her husband
That pandemic-era safety protocols were flagrantly ignored, putting the mother at serious medical risk
That the family’s peaceful, routine-centred homeschooling was repeatedly disrupted with no justification
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because this letter is the paper equivalent of a velvet restraining order against nonsense. Because one should not need to explain to a government department that gossip isn’t evidence, asthma isn’t optional, and children waving to neighbours is not a cause for alarm. Because if a social worker cannot distinguish abuse from compost, routine from risk, or privacy from pathology — they have no business being in the field.
IV. Violations
Procedural abuse: failure to close or clarify an open “case” after 12 months
Disability discrimination: entering the home of a clinically vulnerable person during COVID against consent
Gender bias: repeatedly bypassing the mother in official communication
Safeguarding theatre: treating a functioning home as suspicious because it lacked conventional aesthetics
Emotional harm: persistent disruption of children’s educational routine based on nothing but rumour
V. SWANK’s Position
We log this complaint as a master record of bureaucratic trespass and maternal restraint. SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
That safeguarding is not a replacement for common sense
That a mother with four vaccinated children and a compost bin is not the crisis here
That repeatedly entering the home of someone with severe asthma during a pandemic is both dangerous and demented
And that if your system allows one neighbour to trigger 12 months of state interference with no findings, then your system is the safeguarding concern
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.