⟡ University of Iowa – Pediatric Asthma Diagnosis ⟡
Filed: 5 March 1981
Reference: SWANK/UniversityOfIowa/PC-77057
Download PDF: 1981-03-05_Core_PC-77057_UniversityOfIowa_PediatricAsthmaDiagnosis.pdf
Summary: Foundational U.S. paediatric asthma diagnosis establishing chronic steroid-dependent respiratory disability from infancy.
I. What Happened
• On 9 January 1981, baby Polly Chromatic (aged eleven months) was examined in the Pediatric Allergy–Pulmonary Clinic at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
• Attending physicians Dr. Miles Weinberger and Dr. Alan Stillerman confirmed a pattern of chronic, steroid-dependent asthma with three prior hospitalisations.
• The report records normal x-rays and labs, ongoing wheezing, and continuous Slo-Phyllin and Prednisone therapy.
• This diagnosis formally anchors a lifelong respiratory disability, predating all U.K. jurisdictional activity by four decades.
II. What the Document Establishes
• Medical confirmation of a lifelong chronic respiratory disability.
• Establishes pre-existing condition continuity for Equality Act and human-rights contexts.
• Demonstrates historical medical legitimacy unaffected by later procedural distortion.
• Illustrates clinical stability, diagnostic clarity, and early professional accountability.
• Acts as foundation document for all subsequent filings referencing disability.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
• It is the origin text — the respiratory genesis of all later legal, medical, and safeguarding claims.
• Serves as a time-stamped factual anchor: evidence of disability before institutional mischaracterisation.
• Represents medical authenticity untouched by policy fashion or bureaucratic revisionism.
• Demonstrates continuity of condition from infancy to adult procedural history.
IV. Applicable Standards & Violations
• Equality Act 2010 s.6 — Chronic respiratory disability (protected condition).
• UN CRPD Article 25 — Right to health and habilitation.
• ECHR Article 8 — Respect for private life, including historic medical identity.
• NHS Constitution §3(b) — Continuity of care (systemically breached in subsequent decades).
V. SWANK’s Position
This is not “historic medical trivia.”
This is clinical lineage — the evidentiary spine of a lifetime.
• We do not accept the administrative fiction of “recent illness.”
• We reject the erasure of medical continuity for bureaucratic convenience.
• We document the inconvenient truth: chronic illness is not emotional misbehaviour.
⟡ This Entry Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every line jurisdictional. Every comma intentional. Every breath accounted for.
Because evidence deserves elegance — and retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Unlicensed reproduction will be cited as panic, not authorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.