SWANK ARCHIVE
Title: Generational Surveillance and Systemic Retaliation: A Stylised Chronology of Procedural Malice and Bureaucratic Theatre
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed From: A sealed study in London, wearing black satin gloves
Date: Finalised, with contempt, 18 May 2025
I. Let the Record Reflect:
I was not paranoid. I was documented.
I was not isolated. I was targeted.
I was not passive. I filed. Filed again. Filed until the silence cracked.
This isn’t a sob story. It’s an institutional crime archive disguised in polite formatting. Welcome to the theatre of procedural gaslight — featuring cameo appearances from social workers who can’t read, doctors who forget oxygen, and judges who lose the plot entirely.
II. Cast of Violators (UK + Overseas Edition):
Social Workers (RBKC, Westminster, Camden, Islington)
MOHHS and DSD (Turks and Caicos’ finest colonial echoes)
HMCTS (the court that can’t accommodate a breath)
NHS Trusts: St Thomas’, Chelsea & Westminster (also starring: bias)
CPS (perpetual bystander)
Metropolitan Police (DPS, Hate Crime Unit: both asleep)
Schools that teach surveillance, not syllabus
III. What They Did:
Weaponised safeguarding to retaliate against legal complaints
Repeatedly endangered a disabled parent in respiratory crisis
Disregarded all written communication requirements (because typing is hard?)
Created records, misfiled truths, and pathologised motherhood
Denied education while pretending to protect it
Racism, rewritten as policy
IV. What I Did:
Documented every encounter, failure, and lie
Filed: N1 Claim, Judicial Review, ICO, IOPC, JCIO, PHSO
Submitted to the UN
Built a sealed archive for my children
Refused their script
V. Core Exhibits:
Master Abuse Record (this document — obviously)
Protective Relief Request (because “stop harassing me” needed legalese)
Hate Crime Statement (because being erased by in-laws deserves a file number)
Police Complaint: UK & TCI (because even colonial holdovers have email now)
UN Special Rapporteur Submission (international shade, formally filed)
VI. Themes You Can’t Ignore:
Safeguarding as Sanction
Disability as Disruption
Mothers as Enemies of the State
Data as Weapon
Racism as Bureaucracy
VII. Final Filing Position:
I did not consent to surveillance. I did not request intervention. I requested breath, education, and peace.
They responded with strategy meetings.
Every time they said “concerned,” they meant “recording.”
Every time they said “procedure,” they meant “power.”
So I filed. And now you’re reading it.
If you’re wondering whether they broke the law — yes. Repeatedly. With decorum. With forms.
Let this archive be admissible, unforgettable, and forever inconvenient.
Filed by:
Polly Chromatic
London, United Kingdom
SWANK-certified. Oxygen-defiant.
Finalised: 18 May 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.