“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

In re: The Open Door — On the Badge as Accomplice to Abuse


⟡ ADDENDUM: POLICE COMPLICITY IN DOMESTIC ABUSE – MIAMI 2009, LONDON 2015, LONDON 2025 ⟡

Filed: 25 September 2025
Reference: SWANK/POLICE/COMPLICITY
Download PDF: 2025-09-25_Core_PoliceComplicity_DomesticAbuse_BromleyHumanRights.pdf
Summary: From Miami to London, the badge did not protect. It enforced abuse. Bromley condemns. Amos outlaws. The police are no longer guardians — they are ushers of violence.

I. What Happened

• Miami, 2009 — Regal was six months old. Police forced an abuser back into the home, overriding lawful exclusion.
• London, 2015 — False stabbing allegation, visibly untrue, yet police compelled cohabitation while I was completing my Master’s degree.
• London, 2025 — Police executed an Emergency Protection Order, seizing four children despite pending litigation and medical evidence.

II. What This Establishes

• Complicity codified — perpetrators legitimised, victims silenced.
• False allegation dynamics — known abuse tactics weaponised.
• Continuum of failure — Miami → London → Westminster: three jurisdictions, one betrayal.
• Academic obstruction — study and research repeatedly disrupted by institutional harassment.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because the police did not fail; they complied.
Because the badge did not hesitate; it escorted.
Because the State did not stumble; it performed abuse as ritual.

IV. Bromley Authority

Bromley decrees: protective parents must not be pathologised.
Yet police forced cohabitation with abusers — the very inversion Bromley condemns.

V. Human Rights Authority

Amos affirms: complicity breaches Article 3 (degrading treatment) and Article 8 (family life).
Add gendered disbelief, and Article 14 (discrimination) is pierced.
Silence victims, and Articles 6 and 13 (fair process and remedy) collapse.

VI. Violations

  • ECHR Articles 2, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 14, 17 — life, dignity, family, expression, remedy, equality, prohibition of abuse of rights.

  • Children Act 1989 & 2004 — welfare duties abandoned.

  • Domestic Abuse Act 2021 — forcing victims to live with abusers recognised as abuse.

  • Equality Act 2010 — discrimination institutionalised.

  • UNCRC, CEDAW, Istanbul Convention — every international guarantee ignored.

VII. SWANK’s Position

The badge has become a key.
The door is opened not to safety, but to abuse.

SWANK archives this as proof that the police are not guardians of law, but its betrayal — handmaidens of abusers, escorts of danger, curators of State-enabled harm.

⟡ Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Filed under Mirror Court Doctrine:
When the badge escorts the abuser inside, the State ceases to police violence and begins to perform it.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.