“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

In re: The Collapse of Safeguarding into Institutionalised Neglect


⟡ ADDENDUM: PATTERN OF MEDICAL NEGLECT AND DISCRIMINATORY DISBELIEF — FROM MOTHER TO CHILDREN ⟡

Filed: 25 September 2025
Reference: SWANK/MEDICAL/NEGLECT-PATTERN
Download PDF: 2025-09-25_Core_MedicalNeglect_DiscriminatoryDisbelief.pdf
Summary: From fictitious illness allegations against the mother to untreated asthma, eczema, and MIH surgery denied to the children — Westminster’s disbelief culture is not safeguarding but medical abandonment.

I. What Happened

• Mother — accused of fabricating illness despite documented eosinophilic asthma (autoimmune disease).
• Children — since removal, all four have endured repeated respiratory infections.
– Forced into school while sick.
– Asthma appointments at Hammersmith ignored.
– Asthma care plans not followed.
– Daily peak flow monitoring abandoned.
– Inhaler prescriptions uncollected.
• Kingdom — eczema spreading across knuckles, untreated.
• Kingdom — scheduled dental surgery for MIH (Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation), due before his 11th birthday, disregarded.
• Pattern — disbelief replicated as neglect across respiratory, dermatological, and dental care.

II. What This Establishes

• Continuity of disbelief — suspicion of fictitious illness migrated from mother to children.
• Multi-system neglect — lungs, skin, and teeth all untreated.
• Asthma mismanagement — care plans, peak flow, and inhalers abandoned.
• Autoimmune linkage — eczema and eosinophilic asthma are autoimmune; neglect of one aggravates the other.
• Unsafe environment — sick children are coerced into attendance and deprived of treatment.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because neglect masquerading as safeguarding must be documented.
Because disbelief institutionalised is not protection but persecution.
Because health abandoned under State supervision is not accident but policy.

IV. Bromley Authority

Bromley decrees: protective parents must not be pathologised.
Yet Westminster twists protection into pathology and neglects care.

V. Human Rights Authority

Amos affirms: disbelief and neglect breach:
– Article 3 ECHR — degrading treatment.
– Article 8 ECHR — interference with family/medical life.
– Article 14 ECHR — discrimination.
– Articles 6 & 13 — denial of fair process and remedy.
Together Bromley and Amos confirm: this is not safeguarding but structural rights violation.

VI. SWANK’s Position

When disbelief replaces care, safeguarding collapses into neglect.

SWANK archives this as proof that Westminster’s safeguarding is medical neglect institutionalised: abandoning lungs, skin, and teeth, while congratulating itself for “protection.”

⟡ Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.