“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

In re: The Empty Chair — On the Absence of Regal from Lawful Contact


⟡ ADDENDUM: ABSENCE OF CHILD (REGAL) FROM CONTACT SESSION ⟡

Filed: 25 September 2025
Reference: SWANK/CONTACT/ABSENCE-REGAL
Download PDF: 2025-09-25_Core_ContactAbsence_Regal_BromleyHumanRights.pdf
Summary: Regal’s unexplained absence from family contact on 25 September 2025 exemplifies unlawful interference with children’s rights. Bromley condemns. Amos confirms. The empty chair indicts the Authority, not the family.

I. What Happened

• On 25 September 2025, at a scheduled contact session with the children’s grandmother, Regal was absent.
• No advance notice provided.
• No written or verbal explanation offered.
• Contact centre staff failed to log or explain the absence.
• Regal’s siblings expressed visible confusion and disappointment.

II. What This Establishes

• Interference without justification — lawful contact disrupted.
• Disruption of sibling unity — absence fractured the family session.
• Failure of transparency — no prior notice, no explanation.
• Emotional harm — siblings experienced distress.
• Institutional negligence — the absence left undocumented.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because each empty chair is not an oversight but a structural act of control.
Because contact irregularities compound harm.
Because safeguarding collapses when contact is weaponised.

IV. Bromley Authority

Bromley decrees: contact must be regular, predictable, purposeful.
Unexplained absence is not discretion — it is breach of safeguarding duty.

V. Human Rights Authority

Amos affirms: unjustified disruption breaches:
– Article 8 ECHR — right to family life.
– Article 14 ECHR — discrimination aggravates the violation.
Contact irregularities are not footnotes — they are rights violations.

VI. SWANK’s Position

When a child’s seat is left empty without explanation, contact ceases to be care and becomes control.

SWANK archives this absence as evidence that Westminster’s safeguarding is not protection but management theatre: care sessions hollowed out by opacity, siblings separated without reason, family bonds dismantled by silence.

⟡ Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.