Interrogated Without Cause. Referred Without Truth.

---

⟡ SWANK Archive: Education Misconduct Dossier ⟡

“He Was Stuttering. They Weren’t Listening.”
Filed: 14 November 2022
Reference: SWANK/EDUCATION/DRAYTON-PARK/INTERROGATION-DISPUTE
📎 Download PDF – 2022-11-14_SWANK_DraytonPark_SafeguardingReferral_Dispute_KingInterview.pdf

---

I. They Called It a Check-In. It Was an Interrogation.

On an otherwise unremarkable school day in November 2022, staff at Drayton Park Primary subjected a disabled child to a closed-door safeguarding interview without parental knowledge or cause.

The trigger?

“Something he said.”

The outcome?

An anxious child, an unlawful referral, and a letter of unimpressed correction.

This wasn’t safeguarding.

It was suspicion — masquerading as support and delivered without consent.

---

II. What the Letter Documents

• A school-initiated interview with a child already known to be vulnerable

• The child distressed and stammering, described in staff notes — yet interrogated further

• The school failing to:

  • Notify the parent before or after

  • Review contextual medical background

  • Protect against emotional aggravation of disability

• A fabricated or distorted safeguarding referral issued without procedural basis

No safeguarding threshold was met.

And yet, the referral was made.

---

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is what schools now do:

• Equate neurodivergence with risk

• Use child-led statements to fabricate adult-led crises

• Assume a parental absence of knowledge — and institutional supremacy in interpretation

We filed this letter because:

• The child did not need protection

• He needed to be believed

• And his mother was not absent — she was already filing

This isn’t about one staff member.
It is about the institutional comfort with asking questions they aren’t qualified to interpret.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept covert interviews of disabled children.
We do not accept safeguarding language weaponised for convenience.
We do not accept referral theatre.

Let the record show:

The child was stammering.
The staff continued.
The mother responded.
And now — the record is public.

This wasn’t protection.
It was interrogation without jurisdiction.
And SWANK does not redact the names of those who breached it.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

---