“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion
-
⟡ “I Told You I Was Broken. You Scheduled a Visit.” ⟡ A scheduling exchange that becomes a procedural indictment. Westminster asked for a ...
-
They are not safe . They are being treated like trash . They must be returned home immediately, where they will be safe and properly cared...
-
🪞 The Bleach Clause Or, When Westminster Couldn't Even Schedule a Strand Filed: 8 August 2025 Reference: SWANK-DELAY/PERSONALGROOMING/P...
-
Ancestrally Filed, Royally Ignored, Universally Understood Filed: 9 August 2025 Filed By: SWANK London Ltd. PDF: 2025-08-09_SWANK_Post_Chr...
-
🪞 SWANK London Ltd. Asthma Is Not a Behavioural Problem Documenting Nutritional Neglect, Xenophobic Humiliation, and Medical Endangerment ...
-
🪞WHEN WILL WESTMINSTER WAKE UP? Or, The Bureaucratic Slumber Party That Ended Four Childhoods Filed to: SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue Filed:...
-
Welcome, Swankanator. You've arrived. Or more precisely, you've been inducted. This is not a newsletter. This is not a campaign. Thi...
-
🪞SWANK London Ltd. The Evidentiary Catalogue of Procedural Abuse The Bleeding of the Boy – A Mother's Dispatch to a Deaf State (Re: URG...
-
💠 SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue 💠 ✒️ Filed: 2 August 2025 | Ref Code: WCC-SAFEGUARDING-CRIMINAL-RETALIATION | PDF: 2025-08-02_SWANK_Crimina...
-
🪞THE SCIENCE OF RETALIATION Or, What Institutions Reveal When They Panic Filed to: SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue Filed: 6 August 2025 Refer...
On Formal Acknowledgment and the Art of Saying Very Little: A Response from RBKC’s Customer Relationship Team
🦚 On Formal Acknowledgment and the Art of Saying Very Little: A Response from RBKC’s Customer Relationship Team
Filed under the documentation of courteous placeholders and the ceremonial act of "looking into things."
13 February 2024
Our reference: 12136041
To: Polly
📜 Dear Polly,
Thank you for your complaint, which we acknowledge receipt of on 12 February 2024.
🧾 On Timeline and Tactful Vagueness
We are presently looking into what you’ve told us, and aim — with appropriate reverence to internal processes — to provide a response by 26 February 2024.
Should additional information be required, rest assured —
we shall be in touch.
No need, of course, for detail, specificity, or substantive engagement just yet.
For now, we offer this letter — a ceremonial marker of awareness.
📚 On Further Reading
For those inclined to understand the machinery into which their concerns have been gently ushered, we graciously provide the following link:
🔗 RBKC Complaints Process
Because knowing the route rarely guarantees the destination.
📜 Kind regards,
Customer Relationship Team
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.