⟡ Terms of Lawful Disengagement and Child Return
A Public Resolution Notice from SWANK London Ltd
⚖️ Filed: 2025-07-04
Reference Code: SWK-NG-UNADDRESSED-2306
One-line summary:
A formal public notice offering terms of lawful resolution in relation to an £88 million civil claim naming 23 defendants, including senior Westminster staff.
I. What This Is
This is a public notice. It is not a private letter.
It is not addressed to any one party.
It is a published opportunity for lawful resolution and disengagement, issued by the harmed party prior to further escalation of an active £88 million civil claim filed in the High Court of Justice.
That claim names 23 individual and institutional defendants, including — but not limited to — Kirsty Hornal, Sam Brown, and Sarah Newman, in their professional capacities. The N1 action cites institutional retaliation, disability discrimination, unlawful safeguarding, and medical neglect.
If you are reading this and believe it applies to you, then it likely does.
II. The Conditions Offered
The following non-negotiable minimum terms are set forth:
Immediate restoration of written-only communication, in accordance with prior disability adjustment notices and statutory equality duties.
Immediate return of all four children to their family of origin, or transfer to a vetted family member or trusted carer (father, maternal grandmother, or designated adult), under the lawful direction of their mother.
Permanent removal of named professionals, including those cited in civil litigation, from the family’s case and all future involvement.
Complete and irrevocable disengagement from social work oversight, unless explicitly re-invited by the family at a later time.
Withdrawal of the current Interim Care Order (ICO) and closure of all related safeguarding, contact restrictions, and data obstructions.
Immediate reinstatement of all cancelled medical care, including asthma, trauma recovery, and disability-related oversight previously withheld or obstructed.
No further obstruction of civil litigation, disability rights enforcement, family law filings, or documentation activity by SWANK London Ltd.
III. What This Letter Establishes
This document is not a plea. It is a recorded offering of lawful terms.
It does not imply waiver of damages, admissions, or factual concessions.
It simply demonstrates that a path to resolution was publicly made available — and declined, if ignored.
Should these terms be accepted in writing, the claimant is prepared to consider:
Amending the N1 claim to remove specific individuals where appropriate
Temporary deferment of SWANK publication escalation
Full strategic focus on family and medical restoration
IV. Deadline to Acknowledge This Offer
A response is expected by 11 July 2025.
Failure to respond will result in:
Filing of the prepared Judicial Review application
Immediate N161 appeal of the ICO
Escalated documentation to the JCIO, Equality and Human Rights Commission, and U.S. Embassy
Continued publication of evidentiary materials through SWANK London Ltd.
V. SWANK’s Position
This document is retained and published as proof of reasonable conduct in the context of institutional aggression.
Should the named authorities or professionals continue to obstruct lawful remedy, this Notice will serve as evidence that peace was possible — and rejected.
The legal, emotional, and reputational cost of this refusal will be theirs to own, not ours to forget.
⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive
Downloaded via www.swanklondon.com
Not edited. Not deleted. Only documented.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.