“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

You Were Told. You Just Thought She’d Stay Quiet.


⟡ They Said They Weren’t Warned. She Sent Them a Timeline. ⟡
If you can't remember your own misconduct, don't worry — she logged it for you.

Filed: 5 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/MULTI/EVIDENCE-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-05_SWANK_EvidenceIndex_UpdatedCorrespondenceSummary.pdf
An updated master correspondence summary detailing legal notifications, police reports, disability rights enforcement, safeguarding retaliation, and procedural misconduct sent across institutions — in sequence, in writing, and now, in public.

I. What Happened

Social workers claimed surprise.
Lawyers said “we weren’t aware.”
Institutions feigned ignorance.
So the mother compiled everything.
This index is the official correspondence map: it proves that she notified every actor, repeatedly, across multiple channels, months before escalation.

II. What the Record Establishes

  • That Westminster was made aware of N1 litigation, police reports, and medical restrictions

  • That multiple refusals, exemptions, and legal boundaries were issued in writing

  • That safeguarding escalations occurred after these warnings — not before

  • That formal complaints, claims, and refusal proxies were time-stamped and institutionally ignored

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because paper trails don’t lie — people do.
Because the only thing more dangerous than retaliation is pretending it’s concern.
And because when you say “we didn’t know,” this document becomes your rebuttal.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Disregard for Active Legal Proceedings (N1, Judicial Review)

  • Retaliation Despite Police Reporting and Documented Objection

  • Disability Rights Violations Despite Repeated Medical Evidence

  • Coercive Safeguarding with Full Knowledge of Civil Litigation

  • Institutional Evasion Through Feigned Unawareness

V. SWANK’s Position

There is no more benefit of the doubt.
This isn’t a complaint. It’s a ledger.
It was sent to them — now it’s published for you.
If they ever try to say “this is the first we’re hearing of it,”
point them here and respond:
No, darling — this is the last.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.

We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.

If you post here, you’re part of the record.

Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.

Documented Obsessions