---

🦚 A Formal Complaint Regarding Ms. Sally Silly and Her Mother: An Affront to Professional Standards, Boundaries, and Basic Decorum

Filed under the solemn documentation of professional farce parading as safeguarding.

---

2025.04.04
To: RBKC Complaints Department
Subject: Formal Complaint Regarding Ms Sally Silly and Her Mother – An Affront to Professional Standards, Boundaries, and Basic Decorum

---

🧾 Dear Guardians of Protocol (and, one hopes, Common Sense),

I write with the weary precision of one forced to narrate the utterly implausible — for no citizen should reasonably have to lodge a formal safeguarding complaint involving a social worker’s mother making an unsanctioned appearance at an official home visit.

And yet, here we are.

This complaint concerns Ms. Sally Silly, purportedly employed as a social worker by RBKC, and her mother, who accompanied her on what was allegedly a professional appointment —

but which quickly devolved into something more reminiscent of familial amateur hour than formal service delivery.

---

📜 A Scene Most Improper

On the date already detailed in prior correspondence, Ms. Silly arrived at my home with her mother in tow — not as a passive observer, but as an active and vocal participant.

During this profoundly inappropriate encounter:

• Her mother engaged directly with me and my children, offering unsolicited, unvetted remarks ranging from disturbingly inappropriate to frankly intrusive;

• No introduction was offered;

• No rationale, credential, or explanation for her presence was provided.

What unfolded was not a safeguarding visit.
It was a staged improvisation, with my family conscripted as unwilling participants.

I did not consent to this woman’s presence.
I was not informed she would attend.
And I emphatically reject the notion that social worker home visits are now open to familial accompaniment at the whim of the assigned professional.

---

📚 Catalogue of Misconduct and Distress

Failure	Description
1. A Safeguarding Aberration	Inserting an unvetted, unqualified family member into a private safeguarding visit constitutes a profound safeguarding failure.
2. Collapse of Professional Boundaries	The visit obliterated the distinction between professional conduct and casual familiarity, with trust and authority sacrificed in the process.
3. Delegitimisation of the Process	Power imbalances were exacerbated, procedural integrity was annihilated, and I was left doubting whether this was professional social work at all.
4. Lack of Response or Remedy	Despite raising these concerns, no meaningful investigation, explanation, or apology has been forthcoming — a silence both chilling and complicit.

Safeguarding, it seems, has been replaced by amateur theatrics.

---

🩻 Redress Demanded

Accordingly, I respectfully (though emphatically) request that RBKC:

1. Initiate a full and transparent investigation into the conduct of Ms. Sally Silly, including how and why her mother was permitted to attend a safeguarding visit;

2. Provide a formal written explanation detailing the decision-making failure that allowed this event to occur;

3. Confirm Ms. Silly’s registration status with Social Work England, and whether regulatory action has been initiated;

4. Issue a formal apology and written assurance that safeguarding visits will be treated with the professional gravity they warrant, not as casual family affairs.

---

📜 Final Observations

Social work is — or ought to be — a profession governed by ethics, boundaries, and trust.
This visit failed on all three counts.

That a social worker would arrive unannounced, uncredentialed, and unrepentant with her mother in tow would be laughable — were it not so gravely dangerous and profoundly unprofessional.

My children were left confused.
I was left shaken.
RBKC was left looking dangerously unserious.

This is not merely poor judgment.
It is a glaring indictment of a system increasingly incapable of distinguishing between governance and farce.

I expect a formal, substantive response without further delay.

Yours,
With all due formality and constitutional precision,
Polly

---