π¦ A Formal Complaint Regarding Mr. Gary Apple: A Failure of Leadership, Responsibility, and Response
Filed under the solemn documentation of executive dereliction and institutional dormancy.
2025.04.03
To: complaints@rbkc.gov.uk
Subject: Formal Complaint Regarding Mr Gary Apple – A Failure of Leadership, Responsibility, and Response
π§Ύ Dear Custodians of Civic Rectitude,
I write once again from the precipice of incredulity —
not in response to any new calamity, but in sustained disbelief at what has not occurred: namely, the basic fulfilment of professional duty by Mr. Gary Apple, Director of Family and Children’s Services at RBKC.
Despite bearing a title that implies oversight, accountability, and executive function, Mr. Apple has, in practice, served as little more than a decorative figurehead presiding over institutional dysfunction.
I have contacted him directly on multiple occasions, presenting detailed concerns regarding:
Repeated failures to implement reasonable disability adjustments;
Factually inaccurate assessments and unsupported safeguarding narratives;
Inappropriate conduct by social workers during official visits.
These are not abstract grievances.
They concern lived harm — avoidable trauma, compromised health, and systemic discrimination — sustained firsthand by my child and myself.
And yet, Mr. Apple has chosen the path of strategic dormancy:
No substantive reply.
No visible intervention.
No credible stewardship.
π Dereliction, Documented
Mr. Apple’s silence is not merely impolite.
It is institutionally consequential.
His failure to act upon repeated, serious concerns has permitted:
Misconduct by subordinate staff to proceed unchecked;
The continued denial of disability rights, in direct contravention of legal obligations;
Sustained emotional and physical distress, without corrective safeguarding action.
A Director of Family and Children’s Services is not merely a ceremonial recipient of correspondence.
He is — or ought to be — a steward of public trust.
Mr. Apple has abdicated that responsibility — not once, but repeatedly and systematically.
π§Ύ Requested Redress
Accordingly, I respectfully request:
A formal investigation into Mr. Gary Apple’s failure to respond to, or act upon, repeated safeguarding, discrimination, and misconduct complaints;
Clarification of internal expectations — if any — governing senior officers' responsibilities when receiving safeguarding concerns from disabled parents;
A written response devoid of vague assurances, template platitudes, or euphemistic non-apologies.
π Final Remarks
Let us not pretend that this is a mere “communications issue.”
Mr. Apple’s inaction is not passive.
It is permissive.
It has enabled harm, eroded public trust, and cast serious doubt on whether RBKC's senior leadership retains even a passing acquaintance with the principles of child and family protection.
In the absence of leadership, what remains is only hierarchy —
and that, I fear, is precisely what this borough has become.
I await your written response — though not, alas, with optimism.
Yours,
With due formality and constitutional exactitude,
Polly
No comments:
Post a Comment
This archive is a witness table, not a control panel.
We do not moderate comments. We do, however, read them, remember them, and occasionally reframe them for satirical or educational purposes.
If you post here, you’re part of the record.
Civility is appreciated. Candour is immortal.